Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-43244

Race Condition in Apple Macos ≤ 13.7.7

Published
30 July 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0056 44th percentile
Risk Priority 72 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-43244 is a critical-severity Race Condition (CWE-362) vulnerability in Apple Macos. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 44th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-39 (Process Isolation) and SC-4 (Information in Shared System Resources) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-43244 is a race condition vulnerability (CWE-362) addressed through improved state handling in macOS. It affects macOS Sequoia versions prior to 15.6, macOS Sonoma prior to 14.7.7, and macOS Ventura prior to 13.7.7. The issue enables an app to cause unexpected system termination and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (Critical), reflecting network accessibility, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction required, and high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

A remote, unauthenticated attacker (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) can exploit this race condition by leveraging a malicious app, leading to high confidentiality (C:H), integrity (I:H), and availability (A:H) impacts with unchanged scope (S:U). The primary effect is unexpected system termination, potentially enabling broader disruption.

Apple advisories confirm the vulnerability was fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.6, macOS Sonoma 14.7.7, and macOS Ventura 13.7.7 via improved state handling. Mitigation involves applying these updates, with further details in security content releases at https://support.apple.com/en-us/124149, https://support.apple.com/en-us/124150, https://support.apple.com/en-us/124151, and Full Disclosure mailing list entries at http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Jul/32 and http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Jul/33.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A race condition was addressed with improved state handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.6, macOS Sonoma 14.7.7, macOS Ventura 13.7.7. An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-43420Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-43292Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-43275Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-23275Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-28834Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2023-27952Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-43304Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-40849Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-43728Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-28888Same product: Apple Macos

Affected Assets

apple
macos
≤ 13.7.7 · 14.0 — 14.7.7 · 15.0 — 15.6

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V10.4.2
  • V10.4.5
  • V15.1.3
  • V15.4.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Maintaining separate execution domains for each process structurally eliminates unintended concurrent access to the same shared resources.

Preventing unintended information transfer through shared system resources directly addresses the improper concurrent modification that defines a race condition.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper synchronization primitives and concurrency testing that prevent race conditions.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect race conditions, but does not prevent them at design or coding time.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates concurrency controls and synchronization primitives that directly prevent race conditions.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify thread-safety and locking rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require proper synchronization and resource isolation, addressing the root cause of CWE-362.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe concurrent access patterns and mandate atomic operations or locks.

none

Change management reduces introduction of concurrency bugs during updates, yet does not address the weakness itself.

References