Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-45058 is a high-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Dlink Di-8300 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 33th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-45058 is a buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-120) in the D-Link DI-8300 router running firmware version 16.07.26A1. The flaw occurs in the jingx_asp function when processing the fx parameter, enabling attackers to trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) condition through a specially crafted input. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H), highlighting its potential for significant availability disruption.
The vulnerability can be exploited by unauthenticated attackers with network access to the affected device, requiring low complexity and no user interaction. By sending a malicious payload to the fx parameter, attackers can overflow the buffer in the jingx_asp function, crashing the router and rendering it unavailable, which disrupts network services hosted by the device.
Mitigation guidance and patches may be available through D-Link's official resources, including the English security bulletin at https://www.dlink.com/en/security-bulletin/, Chinese product support page for the DI-8300 at https://www.dlink.com.cn/techsupport/ProductInfo.aspx?m=DI-8300, and a related entry in the IoT vulnerability collection at https://github.com/xiaotea/iot-vulnerability-collection/blob/main/README.md. Security practitioners should consult these for firmware updates or workarounds.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-209310
Vulnerability Data
D-Link DI-8300 v16.07.26A1 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the fx parameter in the jingx_asp function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Engineering principles require bounds checking and safe buffer handling in design.
Memory protection limits the impact of an overflow once it occurs.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.
Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.
Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.
Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.