Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:NSummary
CVE-2025-46570 is a low-severity Observable Timing Discrepancy (CWE-208) vulnerability in Vllm Vllm. Its CVSS base score is 2.6 (Low).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Password Guessing (T1110.001); ranked at the 17th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as NLP and Transformers; in the Adversarial Attacks risk domain.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to IA-6 (Authentication Feedback) and SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-16189
Vulnerability Data
vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to version 0.9.0, when a new prompt is processed, if the PageAttention mechanism finds a matching prefix chunk, the prefill process speeds up, which is reflected in…
more
the TTFT (Time to First Token). These timing differences caused by matching chunks are significant enough to be recognized and exploited. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.0.
- CWE(s)
AI Security AnalysisAI
- AI Category
- NLP and Transformers
- Risk Domain
- Adversarial Attacks
- OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
- None mapped
- Classification Reason
- Matched keywords: llms, vllm
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 1 hardening rule · 1 OS baseline
V11.2.4
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Obscures authentication feedback so that success/failure differences are not observable to attackers.
Developer testing can include timing analysis or side-channel test cases that reveal observable timing discrepancies.
Requires error messages to avoid revealing exploitable details, directly stopping observable response discrepancies.
Engineering principles can mandate constant-time algorithms and side-channel resistance so timing discrepancies are never introduced.
Requiring approved cryptographic modules and algorithms implicitly demands implementations free of observable timing leaks.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require constant-time implementations that eliminate observable timing discrepancies.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Consistent reference clocks limit the attacker's ability to measure or manipulate timing differences that could reveal internal state or processing paths.