Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-47348

Qualcomm Aqt1000 Firmware

Published
07 January 2026
Modified
28 January 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.00073 0.1th percentile
Risk Priority 53 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-47348 is a high-severity Use of Uninitialized Variable (CWE-457) vulnerability in Qualcomm Aqt1000 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 0.1th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-47348 is a memory corruption vulnerability, classified under CWE-457 (Use After Free), that occurs while processing identity credential operations in the trusted application. It affects Qualcomm products, as detailed in their security bulletin. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and was published on 2026-01-07T12:17:04.457.

A local attacker with low privileges can exploit this vulnerability through low-complexity means without requiring user interaction. Successful exploitation enables high-impact consequences across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or disruption within the trusted application context.

Qualcomm's January 2026 security bulletin provides further details on the vulnerability, available at https://docs.qualcomm.com/product/publicresources/securitybulletin/january-2026-bulletin.html, including information on affected products and recommended mitigations or patches.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Memory corruption while processing identity credential operations in the trusted application.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-45551Same product: Qualcomm Aqt1000
CVE-2024-33021Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2024-23356Same product: Qualcomm Aqt1000
CVE-2024-43065Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2024-49848Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2025-47346Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2024-45549Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2024-53021Same product: Qualcomm Aqt1000
CVE-2024-23362Same product: Qualcomm Aqt1000
CVE-2024-23355Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035

Affected Assets

qualcomm
aqt1000 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
ar8035 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
csra6620 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
csra6640 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
fastconnect 6200 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
qcs2290 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
qcs4490 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
qcs5430 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
qcs6125 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
qcs615 firmware
all versions
+194 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and static analysis directly find uses of uninitialized variables before deployment.

Documented development standards and tools can enforce initialization requirements in code.

Engineering principles can mandate explicit variable initialization to avoid uninitialized use.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly catch uninitialized-variable defects via static analysis and code review while the control encompasses many additional development controls.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect uninitialized-variable bugs, but the control is broader.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates practices that reduce uninitialized-variable defects.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify initialization rules, but the control itself does not directly address the weakness.

prevents

Secure coding explicitly requires variable initialization and static-analysis checks.

none

Secure architecture principles encourage defensive coding that can mitigate uninitialized variables.

References