Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-50864

Published
20 August 2025
Modified
05 July 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0047 39th percentile
Risk Priority 50 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2025-50864 is a medium-severity Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity (CWE-178) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Masquerading (T1036); ranked at the 39th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-24 (Access Control Decisions) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An Origin Validation Error in the elysia-cors library thru 1.3.0 allows attackers to bypass Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) restrictions. The library incorrectly validates the supplied origin by checking if it is a substring of any domain in the site's CORS…

more

policy, rather than performing an exact match. For example, a malicious origin like "notexample.com", "example.common.net" is whitelisted when the site's CORS policy specifies "example.com." This vulnerability enables unauthorized access to user data on sites using the elysia-cors library for CORS validation.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1036 Masquerading Stealth
Adversaries may attempt to manipulate features of their artifacts to make them appear legitimate or benign to users and/or security tools.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-72836Shared CWE-178
CVE-2026-27587Shared CWE-178
CVE-2026-15573Shared CWE-178
CVE-2026-62230Shared CWE-178
CVE-2025-46701Shared CWE-178
CVE-2026-33691Shared CWE-178
CVE-2026-43513Shared CWE-178
CVE-2026-62673Shared CWE-178
CVE-2026-27588Shared CWE-178
CVE-2026-59335Shared CWE-178

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Applying access control decisions to each request depends on accurate property determination that accounts for case differences.

Correct enforcement of authorizations for resource access structurally requires consistent case-sensitive handling of identifiers to avoid incorrect decisions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices can catch and prevent case-sensitivity flaws during code review or testing, but fixing one CWE achieves negligible coverage of the broad control.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure SDLC practices should include case-sensitivity requirements in design and coding standards.

prevents

Application security requirements must specify case handling for identifiers and paths.

prevents

Architecture principles should enforce canonical, case-aware resource naming.

prevents

Secure coding guidelines must mandate explicit case handling to prevent inconsistent lookups.

degrades

Access-control rules that ignore case can allow unintended resource access.

degrades

Authentication logic must treat identifiers consistently to avoid bypass via case differences.

References