Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-52429

Qnap Qts 5.2.0.2737 … 5.2.5.3145

Published
03 October 2025
Modified
08 October 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 5.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0034 26th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-52429 is a medium-severity Use of Externally-Controlled Format String (CWE-134) vulnerability in Qnap Qts. Its CVSS base score is 5.1 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 26th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SI-2 (Flaw Remediation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to obtain secret data or modify memory. We have…

more

already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.6.3195 build 20250715 and later QuTS hero h5.2.6.3195 build 20250715 and later

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-53407Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2024-50402Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2025-53591Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2024-50403Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2024-50396Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2024-50398Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2024-50400Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2024-50401Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2025-48730Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2025-53406Same product: Qnap Qts

Affected Assets

qnap
qts
5.2.0.2737, 5.2.0.2744, 5.2.0.2782, 5.2.0.2802, 5.2.0.2823
qnap
quts hero
h5.2.0.2737, h5.2.0.2782, h5.2.0.2789, h5.2.0.2802, h5.2.0.2823

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-2 Flaw Remediation
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
  • SI-16 Memory Protection
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly requires timely application of vendor patches that eliminate the externally-controlled format string flaw in the listed QTS/QuTS hero builds.

prevent

Mandates validation and sanitization of all input strings before use in formatting functions, blocking CWE-134 exploitation even when an admin account is obtained.

prevent

Enforces memory-protection mechanisms that limit the ability of a successful format-string attack to read secrets or corrupt memory.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent external format strings via code review, static analysis, and safe APIs.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification can discover existing format-string flaws but does not prevent their introduction.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development can detect format-string vulnerabilities before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and safe API usage that can prevent externally-controlled format strings.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify safe formatting functions and ban uncontrolled format strings.

prevents

Secure architecture principles discourage dangerous string-handling patterns that lead to format-string issues.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly forbid the use of untrusted format strings and prescribe safe alternatives.

References