Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-52658

Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics 6.6

Published
03 October 2025
Modified
10 October 2025
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 3.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0018 8th percentile
Risk Priority 28 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-52658 is a low-severity Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components (CWE-1104) vulnerability in Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics. Its CVSS base score is 3.5 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Drive-by Compromise (T1189); ranked at the 8th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-22 (Unsupported System Components) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A03:2025 Software Supply Chain FailuresA06:2025 Insecure Design

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

HCL MyXalytics is affected by the use of vulnerable/outdated versions which can expose the application to known security risks that could be exploited.

CWE(s)
CWE-1104CWE-1021

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1189 Drive-by Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access to a system through a user visiting a website over the normal course of browsing.
attack.mitre.org →
T1195.001 Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools Initial Access
Adversaries may manipulate software dependencies and development tools prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise.
attack.mitre.org →
T1056 Input Capture Collection
Adversaries may use methods of capturing user input to obtain credentials or collect information.
attack.mitre.org →
T1195 Supply Chain Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may manipulate products or product delivery mechanisms prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise.
attack.mitre.org →
T1557 Adversary-in-the-Middle Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to position themselves between two or more networked devices using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique to support follow-on behaviors such as [Network Sniffing](https://attack.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-42177Same product: Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics
CVE-2023-50350Same product: Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics
CVE-2023-50351Same product: Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics
CVE-2025-52654Same product: Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics
CVE-2025-52653Same product: Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics
CVE-2024-42172Same product: Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics
CVE-2023-45722Same product: Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics
CVE-2024-42180Same product: Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics
CVE-2023-50343Same product: Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics
CVE-2024-42178Same product: Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics

Affected Assets

hcltech
dryice myxalytics
6.6

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 1 hardening rule · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V15.1.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-22 Unsupported System Components good match

SA-22 directly requires replacing components once vendor support ends, structurally preventing reliance on unmaintained third-party code.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require implementing frame-ancestors / X-Frame-Options controls that prevent this weakness.

GV.RM-04 partial match
prevents

GV.RM-04's high-level risk-response criteria can indirectly discourage unmaintained third-party use via policy, but alone removes none of the concrete supply-chain or maintenance decisions that produce CWE-1104.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing can detect missing frame protections, but does not itself implement the control.

A.8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities mostly match
finds

A maintained asset inventory plus scheduled scanning and patching directly reduces the window during which known vulnerable third-party components remain exploitable.

A.5.21 Managing information security in the ICT supply chain partial match
prevents

Periodic validation, certification demands, and life-cycle monitoring of supplier components help surface and replace unmaintained third-party elements before they become exploitable liabilities.

A.8.23 Web filtering partial match
degrades

Web filtering can block or sandbox untrusted frames, but does not enforce application-level frame-busting or CSP.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements can mandate frame-ancestors / X-Frame-Options, directly addressing UI redressing risks.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure architecture principles include isolation of UI layers and proper use of browser security controls.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
  • V-248521 OL 8 must be a vendor-supported release. prevents CWE-1104

References