Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-55332

Microsoft Windows 10 1809 ≤ 10.0.17763.7919

Published
14 October 2025
Modified
27 October 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0054 43th percentile
Risk Priority 47 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-55332 is a medium-severity Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow (CWE-841) vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 10 1809. Its CVSS base score is 6.1 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique External Remote Services (T1133); ranked at the 43th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and IA-11 (Re-authentication) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Improper enforcement of behavioral workflow in Windows BitLocker allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature with a physical attack.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1133 External Remote Services Persistence
Adversaries may leverage external-facing remote services to initially access and/or persist within a network.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1657 Financial Theft Impact
Adversaries may steal monetary resources from targets through extortion, social engineering, technical theft, or other methods aimed at their own financial gain at the expense of the availability of these resources for victims.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-55330Same product: Microsoft Windows 11 22H2
CVE-2025-55682Same product: Microsoft Windows 11 24H2
CVE-2025-55337Same product: Microsoft Windows 11 24H2
CVE-2024-49076Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-43629Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-43624Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-49132Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-49097Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-49095Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-38143Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809

Affected Assets

microsoft
windows 10 1809
≤ 10.0.17763.7919
microsoft
windows 10 21h2
≤ 10.0.19044.6456
microsoft
windows 10 22h2
≤ 10.0.19045.6456
microsoft
windows 11 22h2
≤ 10.0.22621.6060
microsoft
windows 11 23h2
≤ 10.0.22631.6060
microsoft
windows 11 24h2
≤ 10.0.26100.6899
microsoft
windows 11 25h2
≤ 10.0.26200.6899
microsoft
windows server 2019
≤ 10.0.17763.7919
microsoft
windows server 2022
≤ 10.0.20348.4294
microsoft
windows server 2022 23h2
≤ 10.0.25398.1913
+1 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V7.2.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Access enforcement can require each successive workflow step to present the proper authorization context before proceeding.

Re-authentication requirements can be placed at critical workflow steps to ensure the actor has performed prior behaviors.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
degrades

Secure development practices directly address proper workflow enforcement during design and coding.

PR.AA-05 partial match
prevents

Enforcing authorization policies can include sequence constraints on multi-step actions.

PR.PS-01 partial match
prevents

Hardened configuration baselines can embed required workflow ordering rules.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect workflow bypasses but does not enforce them at runtime.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle requires explicit workflow enforcement in multi-step processes.

prevents

Application security requirements include sequencing and state-transition rules for critical workflows.

prevents

Secure architecture principles address proper ordering of security-critical operations.

prevents

Secure coding practices can prevent missing workflow checks but do not define the control itself.

mitigates

Change management can require workflow adherence for changes but is not the primary mitigation.

References