Cyber Resilience

CWE · MITRE source

CWE-841Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow

Abstraction: Class · CVEs in our corpus: 54

The product supports a session in which more than one behavior must be performed by an actor, but it does not properly ensure that the actor performs the behaviors in the required sequence.

By performing actions in an unexpected order, or by omitting steps, an attacker could manipulate the business logic of the product or cause it to enter an invalid state. In some cases, this can also expose resultant weaknesses. For example, a file-sharing protocol might require that an actor perform separate steps to provide a username, then a password, before being able to transfer files. If the file-sharing server accepts a password command followed by a transfer command, without any username being provided, the product might still perform the transfer. Note that this is different than CWE-696, which focuses on when the product performs actions in the wrong sequence; this entry is closely related, but it is focused on ensuring that the actor performs actions in the correct sequence. Workflow-related behaviors include:

Last updated: 04 July 2026 00:28 UTC

Cumulative inbound coverage

How completely the frameworks we cross-walk collectively cover this — the verdict is the strongest single mapping (overlapping partials are not summed); breadth shows the corroboration behind it.

Collective: mostly · 4 mapping(s) from 3 framework(s): ATT&CK 2 (partial) · OWASP-Web 1 (mostly) · ASVS 5.0 1 (partial)

See the full cumulative-coverage rollup →

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

This weakness contributes to A06:2025 Insecure Design.

NIST 800-53 r5 controls that address this weakness (0)AI

Control Title Family Why it addresses this CWE
No NIST controls proposed yet.

MITRE ATT&CK techniques this weakness enables

Our own two-way CWE↔ATT&CK cross-walk — a direct mapping with no public source (the CWE→CAPEC→ATT&CK chain leaves most top weaknesses, incl. XSS and SQLi, mapped to nothing). Drafted by Grok and spot-checked by Claude Opus 4.8.

Direction: other covers this; this covers other (F/M/P = full / mostly / partial).

Top CVEs of this weakness type, ranked by Risk Priority

CVE Risk CVSS EPSS Published
CVE-2022-21027.09.40.00852022-06-24
CVE-2022-21057.09.40.01002022-06-24
CVE-2025-48481 UPD7.09.80.00452025-05-30
CVE-2026-31307.09.80.00452026-03-03
CVE-2026-307837.09.80.00382026-03-05
CVE-2026-34582 UPD7.09.10.00232026-04-07
CVE-2022-16675.57.50.01162022-06-24
CVE-2023-59215.57.10.00252023-11-22
CVE-2024-04105.57.70.00462024-02-22
CVE-2024-463075.57.50.00532024-10-09
CVE-2024-517385.58.10.00562025-01-20
CVE-2025-48476 UPD5.58.80.00452025-05-30
CVE-2025-48477 UPD5.58.10.00412025-05-30
CVE-2025-524695.57.10.00292026-03-02
CVE-2026-305745.57.50.00262026-03-27
CVE-2026-412595.57.50.00212026-04-23
CVE-2026-42246 UPD5.57.40.00322026-05-09
CVE-2026-43937 UPD5.58.80.00492026-05-12
CVE-2026-485055.57.40.00192026-06-22
CVE-2023-13833.55.40.00282023-05-03
CVE-2023-41813.55.40.00972023-08-06
CVE-2022-467103.55.50.00212024-01-10
CVE-2024-372963.55.30.00552024-06-11
CVE-2024-61283.55.30.00542024-06-18
CVE-2024-393253.55.30.00432024-07-02