CVE-2025-55398
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-55398 is a critical-severity Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input (CWE-1284) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 30th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-55398 affects the mouse07410 asn1c library through version 0.9.29 (dated 2025-03-20), a fork of vlm asn1c. The vulnerability resides in UPER (Unaligned Packed Encoding Rules) decoders generated by asn1c, which fail to enforce INTEGER constraints when the bound is positive and exceeds 32 bits in length. This flaw, tracked under CWE-1284, enables the processing of incorrect or malicious input and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating critical severity.
Remote attackers require no privileges, authentication, or user interaction to exploit this vulnerability over the network with low complexity. Successful exploitation allows processing of malformed input in affected decoders, potentially leading to high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability as scored by CVSS.
Details on the issue, including potential mitigations or patches, are discussed in the GitHub advisory at https://github.com/mouse07410/asn1c/issues/222.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-25611
Vulnerability Data
An issue was discovered in mouse07410 asn1c thru 0.9.29 (2025-03-20) - a fork of vlm asn1c. In UPER (Unaligned Packed Encoding Rules), asn1c-generated decoders fail to enforce INTEGER constraints when the bound is positive and exceeds 32 bits in length,…
more
potentially allowing incorrect or malicious input to be processed.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V6.7.2V1.4.2V2.1.1V2.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
SI-10 requires validity checks on information inputs, directly stopping acceptance of malformed quantities before they can be used.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require proper quantity/length validation in input handling.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect missing quantity validation but does not itself implement the control.
Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation for quantity fields, directly preventing CWE-1284.
Application security requirements explicitly call for validation of size/length inputs, mitigating CWE-1284.
Secure architecture principles encourage robust input handling but do not specifically address quantity validation.
Secure coding standards require explicit checks on numeric quantity inputs, fully addressing CWE-1284.