Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-59541

CSRF in Chamilo Lms ≤ 1.11.34

Published
06 March 2026
Modified
09 March 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0015 5th percentile
Risk Priority 57 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2025-59541 is a high-severity CSRF (CWE-352) vulnerability in Chamilo Chamilo Lms. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 5th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SC-23 (Session Authenticity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-59541 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, classified under CWE-352, affecting Chamilo, an open-source learning management system. Versions prior to 1.11.34 are vulnerable due to the absence of anti-CSRF protections, such as tokens, on sensitive actions like project deletion within courses. These actions rely on GET-based requests, enabling unauthorized execution when triggered inadvertently.

An unauthenticated attacker (PR:N) can exploit this over the network (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) by tricking an authenticated Trainer user into visiting a malicious webpage (UI:R). The forged request deletes projects inside a course without the victim's consent, leading to high integrity (I:H) and availability (A:H) impacts but no confidentiality loss (C:N), with an unchanged scope (S:U). The CVSS v3.1 base score is 8.1.

The issue was patched in Chamilo version 1.11.34. Mitigation involves upgrading to this version or later. Additional details are available in the GitHub release notes at https://github.com/chamilo/chamilo-lms/releases/tag/v1.11.34 and the security advisory at https://github.com/chamilo/chamilo-lms/security/advisories/GHSA-rpj6-p9m5-q637.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Chamilo is a learning management system. Prior to version 1.11.34, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability allows an attacker to delete projects inside a course without the victim’s consent. The issue arises because sensitive actions such as project deletion do…

more

not implement anti-CSRF protections (tokens) and GET based requests. As a result, an authenticated user (Trainer) can be tricked into executing this unwanted action by simply visiting a malicious page. This issue has been patched in version 1.11.34.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-30617Same product: Chamilo Chamilo Lms
CVE-2023-39061Same vendor: Chamilo
CVE-2024-41344Shared CWE-352
CVE-2025-30862Shared CWE-352
CVE-2024-39063Shared CWE-352
CVE-2023-23704Shared CWE-352
CVE-2024-39157Shared CWE-352
CVE-2024-54436Shared CWE-352
CVE-2025-25123Shared CWE-352
CVE-2023-28989Shared CWE-352

Affected Assets

chamilo
chamilo lms
≤ 1.11.34

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V3.3.2
  • V3.5.1
  • V10.2.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Access enforcement requires verifying that state-changing requests originate from the authenticated user rather than a forged cross-site source.

Protecting session authenticity prevents attackers from replaying or forging authenticated requests via the victim's browser.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require anti-CSRF controls such as tokens or SameSite attributes.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

mitigates

By denying access to phishing or malicious sites, the control lowers the likelihood that a user will be tricked into submitting a forged request that performs an unintended action on another site.

References