Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-59691

Published
18 September 2025
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 3.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0022 12th percentile
Risk Priority 31 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2025-59691 is a low-severity Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres (CWE-669) vulnerability in Anagogistis (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 3.7 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Escape to Host (T1611); ranked at the 12th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SC-4 (Information in Shared System Resources) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

PureVPN client applications on Linux through September 2025 allow IPv6 traffic to leak outside the VPN tunnel upon network events such as Wi-Fi reconnect or system resume. In the CLI client, the VPN auto-reconnects and claims to be connected, but…

more

IPv6 traffic is no longer routed or blocked. In the GUI client, the IPv6 connection remains functional after disconnection until the user clicks Reconnect. In both cases, the real IPv6 address is exposed to external services, violating user privacy and defeating the advertised IPv6 leak protection. This affects CLI 2.0.1 and GUI 2.10.0.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1611 Escape to Host Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may break out of a container or virtualized environment to gain access to the underlying host.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-25253Shared CWE-669
CVE-2026-48846Shared CWE-669
CVE-2023-41894Shared CWE-669
CVE-2025-41660Shared CWE-669
CVE-2026-40552Shared CWE-669
CVE-2026-40228Shared CWE-669
CVE-2026-44917Shared CWE-669
CVE-2025-62646Shared CWE-669
CVE-2026-40225Shared CWE-669
CVE-2025-62292Shared CWE-669

Affected Assets

Anagogistis
—
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

—

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces approved information flow authorizations between system components and connected systems, directly stopping improper resource transfers across spheres.

Prevents unintended information leakage through shared system resources when crossing sphere boundaries.

Monitors and controls communications at external and key internal boundaries to block unauthorized transfers between trust domains.

Enforces logical access authorizations that limit resource transfers to only approved sphere crossings.

Separates user functionality from system management functions to avoid improper resource or behavior transfer between privilege spheres.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Least-privilege authorization policies directly constrain resource transfers across security domains.

PR.DS-02 partial match
prevents

Protecting data-in-transit can limit exposure during inter-sphere transfers but does not address control-flow or authorization errors.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Logical segmentation and access controls reduce unintended cross-sphere resource movement.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Environment separation limits unintended resource leakage between spheres.

degrades

Information-transfer rules can prevent improper resource hand-off between spheres.

degrades

Access-control policies limit unintended control over transferred resources.

degrades

Managing access rights reduces risk of unauthorized resource transfer.

mitigates

Network-security controls can block improper cross-sphere transfers.

mitigates

Network segregation directly limits unintended resource movement between spheres.

References