Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-62233

Deserialization in Apache Dolphinscheduler 3.2.0 – 3.3.1

Published
24 April 2026
Modified
27 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0054 42th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-62233 is a medium-severity Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502) vulnerability in Apache Dolphinscheduler. Its CVSS base score is 6.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 42th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache DolphinScheduler RPC module. This issue affects Apache DolphinScheduler: Version >= 3.2.0 and < 3.3.1. Attackers who can access the Master or Worker nodes can compromise the system by creating a StandardRpcRequest, injecting a…

more

malicious class type into it, and sending RPC requests to the DolphinScheduler Master/Worker nodes. Users are recommended to upgrade to version [3.3.1], which fixes the issue.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1055 Process Injection Stealth
Adversaries may inject code into processes in order to evade process-based defenses as well as possibly elevate privileges.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
Why these techniques?

The deserialization vulnerability in the RPC module allows attackers with access to Master/Worker nodes to inject malicious serialized objects (StandardRpcRequest with malicious class types), enabling remote code execution via unsafe deserialization. This directly maps to T1190 (Exploit Public-Facing Application) for the RPC interface exposure, T1055 (Process Injection) for achieving code execution through deserialization gadgets, and T1203 (Exploitation for Client Execution) as the malicious payload executes upon deserialization on the target nodes.

Confidence: HIGH · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-43166Same product: Apache Dolphinscheduler
CVE-2026-32967Same product: Apache Dolphinscheduler
CVE-2026-41280Same product: Apache Dolphinscheduler
CVE-2026-32966Same product: Apache Dolphinscheduler
CVE-2026-23902Same product: Apache Dolphinscheduler
CVE-2025-62188Same product: Apache Dolphinscheduler
CVE-2023-48796Same product: Apache Dolphinscheduler
CVE-2023-49068Same product: Apache Dolphinscheduler
CVE-2024-43115Same product: Apache Dolphinscheduler
CVE-2025-64408Same vendor: Apache

Affected Assets

apache
dolphinscheduler
3.2.0 — 3.3.1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • SC-7 Boundary Protection
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly counters CWE-502 by requiring validation of all RPC input (e.g., StandardRpcRequest class types) before deserialization occurs.

prevent

Enforces access control on Master/Worker nodes so that only authorized processes can send RPC requests, blocking the attacker's ability to inject malicious payloads.

prevent

Boundary protection can restrict or inspect traffic to the internal RPC ports used by DolphinScheduler, limiting exposure of the deserialization path.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 none match
prevents

PR.PS-02 addresses only post-deployment updates/patching and cannot prevent introduction of unsafe deserialization code, yet it can remediate some instances when the flaw exists in outdated libraries or components.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing includes validation of deserialization routines and the use of untrusted data, reducing the likelihood that unsafe object reconstruction will be deployed.

prevents

Requiring vetted libraries, regular updates and SAST before release reduces the likelihood that deserialization logic will accept and act on attacker-controlled serialized objects.

detects

Regular scanning of third-party libraries and timely patching reduce the likelihood that unsafe deserialization vulnerabilities remain active.

none

Mandatory malware scanning of data received over networks or storage media intercepts malicious serialized payloads before they are deserialized by the target application.

References