CVE-2025-63835
Memory Safety in Tenda Ac18 Firmware 15.03.05.05
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2025-63835 is a high-severity Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) vulnerability in Tenda Ac18 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210); ranked in the top 48% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-63835, affects Tenda AC18 routers running firmware version v15.03.05.05_multi. The issue resides in the guestSsid parameter handled by the /goform/WifiGuestSet web interface, where insufficient bounds checking allows oversized input to overflow the stack buffer. This flaw is associated with CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write) and CWE-121 (Stack-based Buffer Overflow), earning a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Remote attackers with low privileges, such as authenticated users, can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required. By sending specially crafted oversized data to the guestSsid parameter, attackers can trigger a denial of service condition causing the device to crash, or potentially achieve remote code execution if the overflow is controlled precisely.
The primary advisory reference is a GitHub report detailing the vulnerability at https://github.com/babraink/cve_report/blob/main/cve_report/tenda/tendaAC18/2_wifiguest_guestssid_overflow/README.md, which security practitioners should consult for exploit details and any recommended mitigations, as no patch information is specified in available data.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-48946
Vulnerability Data
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability was discovered in Tenda AC18 v15.03.05.05_multi. The vulnerability exists in the guestSsid parameter of the /goform/WifiGuestSet interface. Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability by sending oversized data to the guestSsid parameter, leading to denial of…
more
service (device crash) or potential remote code execution.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
—
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and bounds checks) finds out-of-bounds write flaws before deployment.
Input validation directly stops untrusted data from exceeding stack buffer bounds.
Memory-protection mechanisms limit the ability to execute injected code after a stack overflow.
Requiring documented secure-development standards and tools can mandate bounds-checked coding practices that avoid the weakness.
Secure-engineering principles include bounds-checked coding and safe buffer handling that avoid introducing the flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices (static analysis, bounds checking, code review) are the primary means of preventing out-of-bounds writes.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover out-of-bounds write flaws so they can be remediated.
Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect and prevent out-of-bounds write defects.
Secure coding directly addresses out-of-bounds writes through language choice and coding standards.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (higher-evidence rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
- V-248594 OL 8 must implement address space layout randomization (ASLR) to protect its memory from unauthorized code execution. blocks CWE-121
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
- V-271452 OL 9 must use a Linux Security Module configured to enforce limits on system services. blocks CWE-121