Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-66486

XSS in Ibm Aspera Shares 1.9.9 – 1.11.1

Published
01 April 2026
Modified
03 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0024 15th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-66486 is a medium-severity Basic XSS (CWE-80) vulnerability in Ibm Aspera Shares. Its CVSS base score is 4.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Browser Session Hijacking (T1185); ranked at the 15th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SI-15 (Information Output Filtering) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.9 through 1.11.0 is vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1185 Browser Session Hijacking Collection
Adversaries may take advantage of security vulnerabilities and inherent functionality in browser software to change content, modify user-behaviors, and intercept information as part of various browser session hijacking techniques.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
Why these techniques?

XSS/HTML injection in public-facing web app enables browser session hijacking and content injection; directly exploitable via T1190.

Confidence: MEDIUM · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-66485Same product: Ibm Aspera Shares
CVE-2024-38318Same product: Ibm Aspera Shares
CVE-2025-0162Same product: Ibm Aspera Shares
CVE-2025-66484Same product: Ibm Aspera Shares
CVE-2024-38317Same product: Ibm Aspera Shares
CVE-2025-66483Same product: Ibm Aspera Shares
CVE-2024-56472Same product: Ibm Aspera Shares
CVE-2024-38316Same product: Ibm Aspera Shares
CVE-2024-56473Same product: Ibm Aspera Shares
CVE-2023-38018Same product: Ibm Aspera Shares

Affected Assets

ibm
aspera shares
1.9.9 — 1.11.1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
  • SI-15 Information Output Filtering
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)
  • SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity
Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.1
  • V1.3.1
  • V1.3.3
  • V1.3.4

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly requires validation and sanitization of untrusted input to block malicious HTML/script before it reaches the browser.

prevent

Requires filtering of information output by the application, preventing injected HTML from being rendered in victims' browsers.

detect

Integrity verification of application output or pages can detect unauthorized HTML/script modifications introduced via the injection flaw.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require output encoding and input validation that prevent basic XSS.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development catches unneutralized script tags before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent basic XSS.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for neutralization of script-related HTML tags.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping of <, >, & to block XSS.

none

Web filtering can block some reflected XSS payloads at the network edge.

References