Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-8070

Published
23 July 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v4 9.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0016 5th percentile
Risk Priority 32 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-8070 is a critical-severity Unquoted Search Path or Element (CWE-428) vulnerability in Asustor (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 9.2 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Path Interception (T1034); ranked at the 5th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The Windows service configuration of ABP and AES contains an unquoted ImagePath registry value vulnerability. This allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code by placing a malicious executable in a predictable location such as C:\Program.exe. If the service runs…

more

with elevated privileges, exploitation results in privilege escalation to SYSTEM level. This vulnerability arises from an unquoted service path affecting systems where the executable resides in a path containing spaces. Affected products and versions include: ABP 2.0.7.6130 and earlier as well as AES 1.0.6.6133 and earlier.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1034 Path Interception Persistence
**This technique has been deprecated.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-66269Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-26911Shared CWE-428
CVE-2020-37061Shared CWE-428
CVE-2025-57227Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-36658Shared CWE-428
CVE-2016-20086Shared CWE-428
CVE-2016-20091Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-2331Shared CWE-428
CVE-2026-1585Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-53947Shared CWE-428

Affected Assets

Asustor
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover unquoted search paths through static analysis or dynamic test cases.

Documented development standards and tools can mandate proper quoting and escaping of path elements.

Engineering principles can require safe construction and quoting of search paths and command elements.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent path-handling flaws such as unquoted elements during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect unquoted search-path issues before deployment.

degrades

Enforcing controlled software installation can prevent unquoted search-path elements in executables and scripts.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle practices include input validation and path handling that reduce unquoted search-path weaknesses.

degrades

Secure system architecture and engineering principles require safe path construction and quoting conventions.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly mandate quoting search paths and avoiding unsafe path construction.

degrades

Change-management processes can enforce review of path-handling changes that might introduce unquoted elements.

References