Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-0082

Google Android 17.0

Published
17 June 2026
Modified
18 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 10.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0016 6th percentile
Risk Priority 45 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-0082 is a critical-severity Insecure Default Variable Initialization (CWE-453) vulnerability in Google Android. Its CVSS base score is 10.0 (Critical).

Operationally, ranked at the 6th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to CM-2 (Baseline Configuration) and CM-6 (Configuration Settings) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In tryStartActivity of NfcDispatcher.java, there is a possible automatic special app access permission assignment due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…

more

exploitation.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-0078Same product: Google Android
CVE-2024-49735Same product: Google Android
CVE-2025-36909Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-40075Same product: Google Android
CVE-2025-48535Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-40077Same product: Google Android
CVE-2024-34740Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-21157Same product: Google Android
CVE-2024-27212Same product: Google Android
CVE-2025-36895Same product: Google Android

Affected Assets

google
android
17.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 4 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

—

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Requires establishing the most restrictive configuration settings, which directly overrides or prevents use of insecure default variable initializations.

Requires maintaining a documented baseline configuration that can enforce secure initial values instead of insecure defaults.

Mandates application of security engineering principles during development that include use of secure defaults and proper variable initialization.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-01 partial match
prevents

Hardened baselines and configuration management directly replace insecure product defaults with secure values.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure software development practices explicitly include choosing safe initial values instead of insecure defaults.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure development life cycle requires explicit secure initialization of variables.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include avoiding insecure defaults in design.

prevents

Secure coding standards mandate explicit, safe variable initialization.

finds

Security testing can detect insecure defaults but does not prevent them.

prevents

Configuration management enforces secure default values and prevents insecure initialization.

References