Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-103106

Published
30 September 2026
Modified
30 September 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0014 3th percentile
Risk Priority 54 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-103106 is a high-severity Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres (CWE-669) vulnerability in Pexip Infinity (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Escape to Host (T1611); ranked at the 3th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Pexip Infinity before 38.2, plus 39.0, 39.1, and 40.0, is affected by improper input validation within an internal Pexip Infinity service that allows an attacker with local access to escalate privileges to root. Exploitation requires an attacker to be able…

more

to run arbitrary code on a node by either achieving remote code execution via some other vulnerability or having administrative access to the operating system.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1611 Escape to Host Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may break out of a container or virtualized environment to gain access to the underlying host.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-48845Shared CWE-669
CVE-2023-44100Shared CWE-669
CVE-2024-42158Shared CWE-669
CVE-2024-38519Shared CWE-669
CVE-2025-59691Shared CWE-669
CVE-2026-35543Shared CWE-669
CVE-2025-59378Shared CWE-669
CVE-2026-32772Shared CWE-669
CVE-2026-40225Shared CWE-669
CVE-2026-48831Shared CWE-669

Affected Assets

Pexip
Infinity
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

—

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces logical access authorizations that limit resource transfers to only approved sphere crossings.

Enforces approved information flow authorizations between system components and connected systems, directly stopping improper resource transfers across spheres.

Separates user functionality from system management functions to avoid improper resource or behavior transfer between privilege spheres.

Prevents unintended information leakage through shared system resources when crossing sphere boundaries.

Monitors and controls communications at external and key internal boundaries to block unauthorized transfers between trust domains.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 partial match
prevents

Least-privilege authorization policies directly constrain resource transfers across security domains.

PR.DS-02 partial match
prevents

Protecting data-in-transit can limit exposure during inter-sphere transfers but does not address control-flow or authorization errors.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Logical segmentation and access controls reduce unintended cross-sphere resource movement.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Information-transfer rules can prevent improper resource hand-off between spheres.

degrades

Access-control policies limit unintended control over transferred resources.

degrades

Managing access rights reduces risk of unauthorized resource transfer.

mitigates

Network-security controls can block improper cross-sphere transfers.

mitigates

Network segregation directly limits unintended resource movement between spheres.

mitigates

Secure SDLC practices can catch incorrect resource-transfer flaws early.

References