CVE-2026-10699
Progress Moveit Transfer ≤ 2024.1.8
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSummary
CVE-2026-10699 is a high-severity Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime (CWE-401) vulnerability in Progress Moveit Transfer. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, ranked at the 27th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-16 (Memory Protection) and SI-2 (Flaw Remediation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-42279
Vulnerability Data
Missing release of memory after effective lifetime vulnerability in Progress MOVEit Transfer (Custom Reports modules). This issue affects MOVEit Transfer: from 2025.0.0 before 2025.0.8, from 2025.1.0 before 2025.1.4, from 2026.0.0 before 2026.0.1.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI
Insufficient information to map techniques.CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
SI-16 requires memory protection mechanisms that prevent improper release or reuse of memory, directly mitigating the CWE-401 memory leak in MOVEit Transfer's Custom Reports module.
SI-2 mandates timely installation of vendor patches; applying the fixes for versions 2025.0.8 / 2025.1.4 / 2026.0.1 eliminates the missing-memory-release flaw.
CM-6 enforces secure configuration settings that can limit exposure or resource exhaustion from the memory leak until patches are applied.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly enforce proper memory allocation/deallocation via coding standards, reviews, and tooling.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect unreleased memory, providing partial coverage of the weakness.
Secure development life cycle mandates memory-management practices that reduce missing-release defects.
Application security requirements can specify explicit memory-release rules, partially mitigating the weakness.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles include resource-management guidelines that address memory leaks.
Secure coding standards directly require proper allocation/deallocation, covering most of this weakness.
Capacity management may detect memory exhaustion symptoms but does not prevent the coding flaw.