Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-11217

Google Chrome ≤ 149.0.7827.53

Published
04 June 2026
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0015 5th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-11217 is a medium-severity Origin Validation Error (CWE-346) vulnerability in Google Chrome. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Drive-by Compromise (T1189); ranked at the 5th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-39 (Process Isolation) and SC-7 (Boundary Protection) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Inappropriate implementation in Fenced Frames in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1189 Drive-by Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access to a system through a user visiting a website over the normal course of browsing.
Why these techniques?

Site isolation bypass in browser renderer enables drive-by cross-origin attacks via crafted HTML after initial renderer compromise.

Confidence: MEDIUM · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-9989Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-11161Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-11081Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-13021Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-7979Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-11176Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-13881Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-11181Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-11243Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-11036Same product: Apple Macos

Affected Assets

google
chrome
≤ 149.0.7827.53

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SC-39 Process Isolation
  • SC-7 Boundary Protection
  • AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 3 hardening rules · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly enforces process isolation between renderer instances, blocking the site-isolation bypass that the compromised Fenced Frames renderer attempts to exploit.

prevent

Implements boundary protection between distinct security domains (sites), preventing unauthorized cross-origin information flows that result from the isolation flaw.

prevent

Enforces information-flow policies between origins, limiting the impact of any renderer-level origin-validation failure (CWE-346).

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-03 mostly match
prevents

Authentication directly verifies the source of users/services/hardware, mitigating origin validation failures.

PR.AA-04 mostly match
prevents

Verifying identity assertions enforces origin validation for conveyed claims.

ID.AM-03 partial match
prevents

Documenting authorized flows supports origin validation by defining expected sources.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Protecting networks from unauthorized access requires origin checks on communication sources.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

mitigates

Network security controls enforce origin validation at network boundaries.

mitigates

Security of network services includes validating the authenticity of service endpoints.

mitigates

Network segregation reduces exposure but does not directly validate origins.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for origin validation of inputs and communications.

prevents

Secure architecture principles encourage origin checks but do not mandate them.

prevents

Secure coding practices include implementing proper origin validation to prevent spoofing.

References