Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-1337

Neo4J ≤ 2026.01

Public PoC
Published
06 February 2026
Modified
24 February 2026
CVSS Score v4 1.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0021 11th percentile
Risk Priority 15 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-1337 is a low-severity Improper Output Neutralization for Logs (CWE-117) vulnerability in Neo4J Neo4J. Its CVSS base score is 1.1 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Indicator Removal (T1070); ranked at the 11th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Insufficient escaping of unicode characters in query log in Neo4j Enterprise and Community editions prior to 2026.01 can lead to XSS if the user opens the logs in a tool that treats them as HTML. There is no security impact…

more

on Neo4j products, but this advisory is released as a precaution to treat the logs as plain text if using versions prior to 2026.01. Proof of concept exploit: https://github.com/JoakimBulow/CVE-2026-1337

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1070 Indicator Removal Stealth
Adversaries may selectively delete or modify artifacts generated to reduce indications of their presence and blend in with legitimate activity.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-34517Same product: Neo4J Neo4J
CVE-2026-1497Same product: Neo4J Neo4J
CVE-2026-1524Same product: Neo4J Neo4J
CVE-2026-1471Same product: Neo4J Neo4J
CVE-2024-52962Shared CWE-117
CVE-2024-7696Shared CWE-117
CVE-2025-0754Shared CWE-117
CVE-2025-36625Shared CWE-117
CVE-2025-54656Shared CWE-117
CVE-2025-25294Shared CWE-117

Affected Assets

neo4j
neo4j
≤ 2026.01 · ≤ 2026.01

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect output neutralization when log messages are constructed from untrusted input.

Input validation reduces the chance that specially crafted data reaches log-message construction routines.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices and coding standards directly require output sanitization for logs.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect log injection flaws but does not prevent them at the source.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
degrades

Logging control directly requires proper log generation and handling, which mitigates improper output neutralization.

finds

Monitoring activities rely on trustworthy logs but do not ensure log message integrity.

prevents

Secure SDLC includes coding standards that reduce log-related weaknesses but does not specifically address logging.

prevents

Secure coding practices mandate input validation and output encoding, directly preventing log injection.

References