Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-2062 is a medium-severity Improper Resource Shutdown or Release (CWE-404) vulnerability in Open5Gs Open5Gs. Its CVSS base score is 5.5 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 49th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-2062 is a null pointer dereference vulnerability in Open5GS versions up to and including 2.7.6. It affects the PGW S5U Address Handler component, specifically the functions sgwc_s5c_handle_modify_bearer_response and sgwc_sxa_handle_session_modification_response. The issue, linked to CWE-404 (Improper Resource Shutdown or Release) and CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference), was published on 2026-02-06.
The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L), indicating it can be exploited remotely by an unauthenticated attacker with low attack complexity and no user interaction. Successful exploitation triggers a null pointer dereference, resulting in a denial-of-service condition with low availability impact and no effects on confidentiality or integrity.
Mitigation involves applying the patch from commit f1bbd7b57f831e2a070780a7d8d5d4c73babdb59 in the Open5GS GitHub repository, which is the recommended fix. Further details are documented in GitHub issues #4257 and the related comment #3787701521.
An exploit for this vulnerability is publicly available and might be used in attacks.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-5621
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was identified in Open5GS up to 2.7.6. This affects the function sgwc_s5c_handle_modify_bearer_response/sgwc_sxa_handle_session_modification_response of the component PGW S5U Address Handler. The manipulation leads to null pointer dereference. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and…
more
might be used. The identifier of the patch is f1bbd7b57f831e2a070780a7d8d5d4c73babdb59. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect resource releases after code is written.
Documented development standards and tools can enforce null-safety rules and safe pointer usage.
Engineering principles can require explicit resource acquisition/release patterns that stop improper shutdown from being introduced.
Priority-based resource allocation limits the blast radius when released resources are not returned to the pool.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly include coding standards for correct resource allocation and release.
Runtime monitoring can detect resource exhaustion caused by improper shutdown or release.
Lifecycle management of assets can encompass proper resource release at end-of-life or shutdown.
Capacity management helps surface leaks from unreleased resources but does not prevent the coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect NULL dereference defects before release.
Including restart, recovery and media-handling instructions reduces the likelihood that resources or sensitive data will be left in an exposed or improperly released state after a failure.
Secure SDLC mandates defensive coding practices that can prevent NULL dereferences.
Application security requirements can specify input validation and pointer-safety rules.
Secure architecture principles encourage defensive design that avoids unsafe pointer use.
Secure coding standards directly require NULL-pointer checks and safe dereference patterns.