Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-22163

Imaginationtech Ddk 25.1 – 25.3

Published
20 March 2026
Modified
21 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.00078 0.1th percentile
Risk Priority 51 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-22163 is a high-severity Missing Synchronization (CWE-820) vulnerability in Imaginationtech Ddk. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 0.1th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-22163 is a vulnerability in the DDK kernel module IOCTL interface of Imagination Technologies GPU drivers. It stems from a lack of synchronization for concurrent access to a shared resource (CWE-820), enabling malware to misuse the interface in an unsupported manner. This misuse subverts the GPU, allowing it to perform writes to arbitrary physical memory pages.

A local attacker with low privileges (PR:L) can exploit this vulnerability, though it requires high attack complexity (AC:H) and no user interaction (UI:N). Successful exploitation grants high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H) with a changed scope (S:C), as indicated by the CVSS v3.1 score of 7.8. The attacker typically needs crafted malware to trigger the IOCTL misuse, leading to GPU subversion and arbitrary physical memory writes, potentially enabling full kernel compromise.

The primary advisory from Imagination Technologies, available at https://www.imaginationtech.com/gpu-driver-vulnerabilities/, provides details on affected versions and recommended mitigations or patches.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Requires malware code to misuse the DDK kernel module IOCTL interface. Such code can use the interface in an unsupported way that allows subversion of the GPU to perform writes to arbitrary physical memory pages. The product utilises a shared…

more

resource in a concurrent manner but does not attempt to synchronise access to the resource.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-22165Same product: Imaginationtech Ddk
CVE-2025-10865Same product: Imaginationtech Ddk
CVE-2025-58408Same product: Imaginationtech Ddk
CVE-2025-58411Same product: Imaginationtech Ddk
CVE-2025-46710Same product: Imaginationtech Ddk
CVE-2025-0467Same product: Imaginationtech Ddk
CVE-2026-22166Same product: Imaginationtech Ddk
CVE-2025-13952Same product: Imaginationtech Ddk
CVE-2026-21734Same product: Imaginationtech Ddk
CVE-2025-46709Same product: Imaginationtech Ddk

Affected Assets

imaginationtech
ddk
1.17, 1.18, 23.2, 24.1, 24.2 · 25.1 — 25.3

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper concurrency controls and synchronization primitives during design and coding.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect missing synchronization through concurrency testing.

prevents

Secure SDLC practices can mandate concurrency controls and synchronization primitives.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify thread-safety and locking mechanisms.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include proper synchronization for shared resources.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly require synchronization primitives to prevent race conditions.

References