Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-23863

Whatsapp ≤ 2.3000.1032164386.258709

Published
01 May 2026
Modified
11 May 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0053 42th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-23863 is a medium-severity Improper Neutralization of Null Byte or NUL Character (CWE-158) vulnerability in Whatsapp Whatsapp. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Masquerading (T1036); ranked at the 42th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and CM-7 (Least Functionality) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An attachment spoofing issue in WhatsApp for Windows prior to v2.3000.1032164386.258709 could have allowed maliciously formatted documents with embedded NUL bytes in the filename to be shown in the application as one type of file but run as an executable…

more

when opened. We have not seen evidence of exploitation in the wild.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1036 Masquerading Stealth
Adversaries may attempt to manipulate features of their artifacts to make them appear legitimate or benign to users and/or security tools.
T1204.002 Malicious File Execution
An adversary may rely upon a user opening a malicious file in order to gain execution.
Why these techniques?

Filename spoofing via NUL bytes directly enables masquerading (T1036) to trick users into executing malicious files (T1204.002).

Confidence: MEDIUM · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-30401Same product: Whatsapp Whatsapp
CVE-2023-38537Same product: Whatsapp Whatsapp
CVE-2019-18426Same product: Whatsapp Whatsapp
CVE-2023-38538Same product: Whatsapp Whatsapp
CVE-2026-23866Same product: Whatsapp Whatsapp
CVE-2025-55179Same product: Whatsapp Whatsapp
CVE-2019-3568Same product: Whatsapp Whatsapp
CVE-2025-55177Same product: Whatsapp Whatsapp
CVE-2025-47812Shared CWE-158
CVE-2009-1537Shared CWE-158

Affected Assets

whatsapp
whatsapp
≤ 2.3000.1032164386.258709

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
  • SI-3 Malicious Code Protection
  • CM-7 Least Functionality
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)
  • SI-3 Malicious Code Protection
Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.10

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly enforces validation and sanitization of untrusted filename input to neutralize NUL bytes that enable type spoofing.

preventdetect

Requires malicious-code protection mechanisms that inspect attachment content and behavior rather than relying solely on the displayed filename.

prevent

Restricts execution of high-risk file types or extensions from messaging applications, limiting the impact of spoofed executables.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input neutralization and validation to prevent null-byte flaws.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing can detect null-byte flaws but does not itself implement the neutralization.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and sanitization that directly prevents null-byte injection.

prevents

Application security requirements include explicit rules for neutralizing dangerous characters such as NUL.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the likelihood of unsafe data flows but do not prescribe character neutralization.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly require proper neutralization of null bytes and other metacharacters.

References