Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSummary
CVE-2026-24324 is a medium-severity Amplification (CWE-405) vulnerability in Sap Businessobjects Business Intelligence Platform. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004); ranked at the 26th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-5 (Denial-of-service Protection) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-6474
Vulnerability Data
SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (AdminTools) allows an authenticated attacker with user privileges to execute a specific query in AdminTools that could cause the Content Management Server (CMS) to crash, rendering the CMS partially or completely unavailable and resulting in…
more
the denial of service of the Content Management Server (CMS). Successful exploitation impacts system availability, while confidentiality and integrity remain unaffected.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI
Why these techniques?
Authenticated query triggers CMS crash enabling application-layer DoS via exploitation (T1499.004); no code execution, auth bypass, or other impacts described.
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Directly requires protection against denial-of-service attacks that render the CMS unavailable, matching the query-induced crash in AdminTools.
Mandates validation of inputs (the specific AdminTools query) to reject malformed or abusive requests before they can exhaust resources or crash the CMS.
Enforces least privilege so that ordinary authenticated users cannot reach the AdminTools functionality capable of triggering the CMS crash.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Resilience mechanisms such as rate limiting and load balancing directly constrain asymmetric resource use.
Capacity planning and monitoring maintain availability headroom against amplification attacks.
Network monitoring detects amplification traffic patterns but does not itself limit asymmetric consumption.
Runtime resource monitoring can surface excessive consumption yet does not enforce authorization or work proofs.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Stress-testing and demand-reduction tactics (e.g., bandwidth throttling) blunt amplification vectors that would otherwise let an attacker multiply resource consumption through a single request.