Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:HSummary
CVE-2026-25503 is a high-severity Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast (CWE-704) vulnerability in Color Iccdev. Its CVSS base score is 7.1 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 17th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-25503 is a type confusion vulnerability (CWE-704, CWE-843) in iccDEV, a set of libraries and tools for interacting with, manipulating, and applying ICC color management profiles. Versions prior to 2.3.1.2 are affected, where loading malformed ICC profiles containing invalid icImageEncodingType values triggers undefined behavior, resulting in denial of service.
The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H). Remote, unauthenticated attackers can exploit it by convincing users to load a specially crafted ICC profile, achieving high availability impact through denial of service and low integrity impact via the resulting undefined behavior.
The flaw was patched in iccDEV version 2.3.1.2. Security practitioners should update to this version for mitigation. Key resources include the GitHub security advisory (GHSA-pf84-4c7q-x764), the patching commit (353e6517a31cb6ac9fdd44ac0103bc2fadb25175), related issue #539, and pull request #547.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-5192
Vulnerability Data
iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools that allow for the interaction, manipulation, and application of ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.2, type confusion allowed malformed ICC profiles to trigger undefined behavior when loading invalid icImageEncodingType values…
more
causing denial of service. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.2.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.5.2V3.2.3V15.3.5
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (static analysis, fuzzing, unit tests) directly finds incorrect type conversions or casts.
Requiring documented development standards and tools can mandate safe typing, casting rules, and compiler checks that stop the weakness from being introduced.
Security engineering principles can require type-safe design and casting practices that structurally avoid incorrect conversions.
Memory-protection controls limit the blast radius when a type-confusion access occurs but do not stop the flaw itself.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly prevent type-conversion flaws via coding standards, reviews, and testing.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can uncover type-conversion defects before release.
Secure development lifecycle includes type-safety reviews that reduce incorrect casts.
Application security requirements can mandate strong typing and safe casting rules.
Secure architecture principles discourage unsafe type conversions in design.
Secure coding standards directly forbid or detect incorrect type casts.