Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-25994

Memory Safety in Pjsip ≤ 2.16

Memory Safety
Published
11 February 2026
Modified
19 February 2026
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v4 8.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.019 78th percentile
Risk Priority 47 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-25994 is a high-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Pjsip Pjsip. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 22% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-25994 is a buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-120) in the PJNATH ICE Session component of PJSIP, a free and open-source multimedia communication library written in C. The issue affects PJSIP versions 2.16 and earlier, where processing credentials containing excessively long usernames triggers the overflow. It has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating critical severity due to its potential for high-impact exploitation.

A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required. By sending malformed credentials with overly long usernames to a vulnerable PJSIP instance handling ICE sessions, the attacker triggers the buffer overflow, potentially achieving arbitrary code execution, data corruption, or denial of service through system crashes.

The PJSIP project has addressed the vulnerability via a security advisory at GHSA-j29p-pvqp and a patch in commit 063b3a155f163cc5a9a1df2c56b6720fd3a0dbb0 on GitHub. Security practitioners should update to a fixed version of PJSIP beyond 2.16 and review deployments using PJNATH for ICE functionality.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

PJSIP is a free and open source multimedia communication library written in C. In 2.16 and earlier, a buffer overflow vulnerability exists in PJNATH ICE Session when processing credentials with excessively long usernames.

CWE(s)
CWE-120

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
attack.mitre.org →
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
attack.mitre.org →
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-32942Same product: Pjsip Pjsip
CVE-2026-26203Same product: Pjsip Pjsip
CVE-2026-26967Same product: Pjsip Pjsip
CVE-2026-28799Same product: Pjsip Pjsip
CVE-2026-29068Same product: Pjsip Pjsip
CVE-2026-32945Same product: Pjsip Pjsip
CVE-2026-40892Same product: Pjsip Pjsip
CVE-2026-40614Same product: Pjsip Pjsip
CVE-2026-33069Same product: Pjsip Pjsip
CVE-2025-45863Shared CWE-120

Affected Assets

pjsip
pjsip
≤ 2.16

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.

SA-8 Security and Privacy Engineering Principles partial match

Engineering principles require bounds checking and safe buffer handling in design.

SI-16 Memory Protection partial match

Memory protection limits the impact of an overflow once it occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.28 Secure coding mostly match
prevents

Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.

References