Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSummary
CVE-2026-26008 is a high-severity Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125) vulnerability in Linuxfoundation Everest. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 30th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-26008 is an out-of-bounds access vulnerability in a std::vector within EVerest, an open-source EV charging software stack. Versions prior to 2026.02.0 are affected, where the issue arises when the Charging Station Management System (CSMS) sends UpdateAllowedEnergyTransferModes messages over the network. This flaw, classified under CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read), can result in remote crashes or memory corruption and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
Attackers can exploit this vulnerability remotely over the network without authentication, privileges, or user interaction, requiring only low attack complexity. Exploitation triggers the out-of-bounds access, leading to high-impact denial of service through application crashes or memory corruption, with no direct effects on confidentiality or integrity.
The official GitHub security advisory (GHSA-vw95-6jj7-3fv9) details the issue and mitigation. EVerest version 2026.2.0 includes a patch that resolves the vulnerability, and users should upgrade to this version or later to protect affected deployments.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-16201
Vulnerability Data
EVerest is an EV charging software stack. Versions prior to 2026.02.0 have an out-of-bounds access (std::vector) that leads to possible remote crash/memory corruption. This is because the CSMS sends UpdateAllowedEnergyTransferModes over the network. Version 2026.2.0 contains a patch.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation directly finds out-of-bounds read flaws through static analysis, fuzzing, and dynamic bounds checks.
Secure engineering principles require bounds checking and memory-safe constructs that stop out-of-bounds reads from being introduced.
Process isolation confines the effects of an out-of-bounds read to the compromised process.
Input validation rejects malformed indices or lengths that would otherwise cause reads outside buffer bounds.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices such as bounds checking and memory-safe languages directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover instances of out-of-bounds reads after code is deployed.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing out-of-bounds read flaws.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance includes fuzzing and static analysis that detect out-of-bounds read defects before release.
Logging can record evidence of an out-of-bounds read but does not prevent the weakness itself.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and bounds checking that directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.
Application security requirements include explicit bounds and memory-safety specifications that mitigate buffer over-reads.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles require memory-safe design patterns and runtime protections against out-of-bounds access.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe pointer arithmetic and mandate bounds-checked reads, eliminating CWE-125.