Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-26234

Jung-Group Smart Visu Server Firmware 1.0.830 – 1.1.1050

Public PoC
Published
12 February 2026
Modified
20 February 2026
CVSS Score v4 8.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0050 40th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-26234 is a high-severity Improper Neutralization of HTTP Headers for Scripting Syntax (CWE-644) vulnerability in Jung-Group Smart Visu Server Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.7 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Content Injection (T1659); ranked at the 40th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-26234 affects JUNG Smart Visu Server version 1.1.1050 and involves a request header manipulation vulnerability. The flaw enables unauthenticated attackers to override request URLs by injecting arbitrary values into the X-Forwarded-Host header. This improper neutralization of HTTP headers for scripting syntax, mapped to CWE-644, carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and was published on 2026-02-12.

Unauthenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability remotely with low complexity and no required privileges, though it necessitates user interaction. By manipulating proxied requests, they generate tainted responses that enable cache poisoning, potential phishing attacks, and redirection of users to malicious domains, resulting in high impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Advisories from VulnCheck (https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/jung-smart-visu-server-improper-neutralization-of-http-headers-for-scripting-syntax) and Zero Science (https://www.zeroscience.mk/en/vulnerabilities/ZSL-2026-5970.php) provide additional details on the vulnerability.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

JUNG Smart Visu Server 1.1.1050 contains a request header manipulation vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to override request URLs by injecting arbitrary values in the X-Forwarded-Host header. Attackers can manipulate proxied requests to generate tainted responses, enabling cache poisoning, potential…

more

phishing, and redirecting users to malicious domains.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-26235Same product: Jung-Group Smart Visu Server
CVE-2025-27632Shared CWE-644
CVE-2025-40631Shared CWE-644
CVE-2025-13213Shared CWE-644
CVE-2025-66485Shared CWE-644
CVE-2024-40686Shared CWE-644
CVE-2024-51451Shared CWE-644
CVE-2025-13803Shared CWE-644
CVE-2025-36227Shared CWE-644
CVE-2026-10836Shared CWE-644

Affected Assets

jung-group
smart visu server firmware
1.0.830 — 1.1.1050

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V4.2.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Input validation directly requires checking/neutralizing untrusted data such as HTTP headers before they reach browser components.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper output encoding and header sanitization to prevent scripting injection.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing catches header-injection issues before release, covering most of the weakness.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevents header-injection flaws.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for neutralizing untrusted data in HTTP headers.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce injection surfaces but do not prescribe header-specific controls.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping or rejection of scripting syntax in HTTP headers.

References