Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-27018

SSRF in Thecodingmachine Gotenberg ≤ 8.29.0

Published
30 March 2026
Modified
08 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 8.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0054 43th percentile
Risk Priority 45 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-27018 is a high-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Thecodingmachine Gotenberg. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 43th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-27018 is a vulnerability in Gotenberg, an API for converting document formats, affecting versions prior to 8.29.0. It allows bypassing the fix previously introduced for CVE-2024-21527 by using mixed-case or uppercase URL schemes. The issue is classified under CWE-22 (Path Traversal) and CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery), with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N), indicating high confidentiality impact from network-accessible exploitation.

Remote attackers require no privileges or user interaction to exploit this vulnerability over the network with low complexity. By submitting requests with manipulated URL schemes, they can circumvent the prior mitigation, potentially achieving unauthorized access to sensitive data as reflected in the high confidentiality impact score.

The vulnerability has been addressed in Gotenberg version 8.29.0. Mitigation details are available in the GitHub security advisory GHSA-jjwv-57xh-xr6r, the release notes at v8.29.0, and associated commits 06b2b2e10c52b58135edbfe82e94d599eb0c5a11 and 8625a4e899eb75e6fcf46d28394334c7fd79fff5. Security practitioners should upgrade to the patched version immediately.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Gotenberg is an API for converting document formats. Prior to version 8.29.0, the fix introduced for CVE-2024-21527 can be bypassed using mixed-case or uppercase URL schemes. This issue has been patched in version 8.29.0.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-42595Same product: Thecodingmachine Gotenberg
CVE-2026-42596Same product: Thecodingmachine Gotenberg
CVE-2026-40280Same product: Thecodingmachine Gotenberg
CVE-2026-42591Same product: Thecodingmachine Gotenberg
CVE-2026-39383Same product: Thecodingmachine Gotenberg
CVE-2026-42597Same product: Thecodingmachine Gotenberg
CVE-2026-42592Same product: Thecodingmachine Gotenberg
CVE-2025-34350Shared CWE-22, CWE-918
CVE-2026-41887Shared CWE-22, CWE-918
CVE-2024-36427Shared CWE-22, CWE-918

Affected Assets

thecodingmachine
gotenberg
≤ 8.29.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2
  • V1.3.6
  • V1.5.3
  • V10.4.7

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.

Information flow enforcement can restrict which destinations the server is allowed to contact on behalf of users.

Input validation directly neutralizes special path elements before pathname construction occurs.

Least privilege reduces the impact of any unauthorized file access obtained via traversal.

Boundary protection limits the network reach of server-initiated requests even if SSRF occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly include input validation and destination allow-listing that prevent SSRF.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.

prevents

Operational threat data describing SSRF campaigns can be used to tighten outbound-request allow-lists and detection rules before attackers exploit them.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.

References