Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-30828

SSRF in Wallosapp Wallos ≤ 4.6.2

Published
07 March 2026
Modified
11 March 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 8.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0053 42th percentile
Risk Priority 45 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-30828 is a high-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Wallosapp Wallos. Its CVSS base score is 8.7 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 42th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-30828 is a vulnerability in Wallos, an open-source, self-hostable personal subscription tracker. In versions prior to 4.6.2, the "url" parameter can be manipulated to retrieve arbitrary local system files. This flaw is associated with CWE-22 (Path Traversal), CWE-29 (Trusted Path), and CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery), earning a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).

Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low complexity, no required privileges, and no user interaction. Unauthenticated adversaries simply need to send a crafted request with a malicious "url" parameter value, enabling them to disclose sensitive local files on the Wallos server, such as configuration files or other system data.

The vulnerability has been patched in Wallos version 4.6.2. The GitHub security advisory (GHSA-p7qj-669r-grvc), release notes for v4.6.2, and the patching commit (e8a513591dbbf885966e2ef55c38622785b9060d) detail the fix; administrators should upgrade immediately to mitigate the risk.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Wallos is an open-source, self-hostable personal subscription tracker. Prior to version 4.6.2, the url parameter can be used to retrieve local system files. This issue has been patched in version 4.6.2.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1005 Data from Local System Collection
Adversaries may search local system sources, such as file systems, configuration files, local databases, virtual machine files, or process memory, to find files of interest and sensitive data prior to Exfiltration.
T1083 File and Directory Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may enumerate files and directories or may search in specific locations of a host or network share for certain information within a file system.
T1552 Unsecured Credentials Credential Access
Adversaries may search compromised systems to find and obtain insecurely stored credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-30839Same product: Wallosapp Wallos
CVE-2026-33399Same product: Wallosapp Wallos
CVE-2026-27479Same product: Wallosapp Wallos
CVE-2026-33407Same product: Wallosapp Wallos
CVE-2026-30840Same product: Wallosapp Wallos
CVE-2026-33401Same product: Wallosapp Wallos
CVE-2023-1177Shared CWE-22, CWE-29
CVE-2024-21542Shared CWE-22, CWE-29
CVE-2023-6021Shared CWE-22, CWE-29
CVE-2023-0104Shared CWE-22, CWE-29

Affected Assets

wallosapp
wallos
≤ 4.6.2

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2
  • V1.3.6
  • V1.5.3
  • V10.4.7

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.

Information flow enforcement can restrict which destinations the server is allowed to contact on behalf of users.

Input validation directly neutralizes special path elements before pathname construction occurs.

Least privilege reduces the impact of any unauthorized file access obtained via traversal.

Boundary protection limits the network reach of server-initiated requests even if SSRF occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and path sanitization that block this traversal vector.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.

prevents

Operational threat data describing SSRF campaigns can be used to tighten outbound-request allow-lists and detection rules before attackers exploit them.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.

References