Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-27980

DoS in Vercel Next.Js 10.0.0 – 16.1.7

Published
18 March 2026
Modified
18 March 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 6.9
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0068 49th percentile
Risk Priority 42 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-27980 is a medium-severity Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) vulnerability in Vercel Next.Js. Its CVSS base score is 6.9 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique OS Exhaustion Flood (T1499.001); ranked at the 49th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-5 (Denial-of-service Protection) and SC-6 (Resource Availability) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-27980 affects Next.js, a React framework for building full-stack web applications, specifically in versions 10.0.0 through 16.1.7 (not including 16.1.7). The vulnerability resides in the default image optimization disk cache located at /_next/image, which lacks a configurable upper bound on its size. This allows unbounded cache growth as the cache stores optimized image variants without limits, potentially leading to disk exhaustion and denial-of-service conditions. The issue is classified under CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Any network-accessible attacker without privileges can exploit this vulnerability by generating a large number of unique image-optimization variants, such as through repeated requests with varying parameters. This forces the cache to store excessive data on disk, exhausting available storage and causing the application to become unavailable due to denial of service. No user interaction or special privileges are required, making it straightforward for remote attackers to trigger.

Mitigation is addressed in the official advisories and patches, including the Next.js security advisory (GHSA-3x4c-7xq6-9pq8), release notes for v16.1.7, and the fixing commit (39eb8e0ac498b48855a0430fbf4c22276a73b4bd). Upgrading to version 16.1.7 or later introduces an LRU-backed disk cache with the configurable images.maximumDiskCacheSize option, which evicts least-recently-used entries when the limit is reached; setting it to 0 disables disk caching entirely. As interim measures, administrators should periodically clean the .next/cache/images directory and reduce variant cardinality by tightening configurations for images.localPatterns, images.remotePatterns, and images.qualities.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 10.0.0 and prior to version 16.1.7, the default Next.js image optimization disk cache (`/_next/image`) did not have a configurable upper bound, allowing unbounded cache growth. An attacker…

more

could generate many unique image-optimization variants and exhaust disk space, causing denial of service. This is fixed in version 16.1.7 by adding an LRU-backed disk cache with `images.maximumDiskCacheSize`, including eviction of least-recently-used entries when the limit is exceeded. Setting `maximumDiskCacheSize: 0` disables disk caching. If upgrading is not immediately possible, periodically clean `.next/cache/images` and/or reduce variant cardinality (e.g., tighten values for `images.localPatterns`, `images.remotePatterns`, and `images.qualities`).

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499.001 OS Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may launch a denial of service (DoS) attack targeting an endpoint's operating system (OS).
T1498 Network Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Network Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of targeted resources to users.
T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.002 Service Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target the different network services provided by systems to conduct a denial of service (DoS).
T1499.003 Application Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-59471Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2024-39693Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2025-59472Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2024-56332Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2026-44577Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2026-27979Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2026-44579Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2026-64641Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2024-47831Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2026-44574Same product: Vercel Next.Js

Affected Assets

vercel
next.js
10.0.0 — 16.1.7

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SC-5 directly limits the effects of resource-exhaustion events that constitute uncontrolled consumption.

SC-6 enforces explicit allocation limits on resources, structurally preventing the weakness from occurring.

Process isolation confines resource consumption to separate domains, reducing blast radius without stopping the root flaw.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.IR-04 mostly match
prevents

Explicitly requires monitoring and maintaining resource capacity, directly addressing uncontrolled consumption to preserve availability.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Continuous monitoring of computing resources can detect resource exhaustion but does not itself enforce allocation limits.

PR.IR-03 partial match
prevents

Resilience mechanisms such as avoiding single points of failure indirectly reduce impact of resource exhaustion.

PR.PS-01 partial match
prevents

Hardened configuration baselines can include resource quotas and limits that constrain consumption.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Resource-utilization monitoring and alerting on bottlenecks or overloads limits the impact of denial-of-service or resource-exhaustion attacks.

prevents

By continuously monitoring utilization, stress-testing peak loads, and maintaining documented plans to scale or throttle resources, the control directly limits an attacker’s ability to drive a system into uncontrolled resource exhaustion.

finds

Pre-agreed severity-based prioritization and resource allocation during incident triage reduce the likelihood that an attacker-induced resource exhaustion will overwhelm the organization before corrective action is taken.

mitigates

Business-continuity plans that include resource-management controls reduce the likelihood that an attacker can trigger uncontrolled resource consumption by forcing the system into a degraded or fallback state.

mitigates

Defining RTOs and capacity requirements for ICT services during business-impact analysis forces organizations to provision sufficient resources and throttling mechanisms, reducing the likelihood that an attacker can induce denial-of-service through uncontrolled resource consumption.

finds

Early notification of anomalous resource consumption or system malfunctions enables throttling or isolation before availability is lost.

References