CVE-2026-2895
Auth Bypass in Funadmin ≤ 7.1.0
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-2895 is a medium-severity Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password (CWE-640) vulnerability in Funadmin Funadmin. Its CVSS base score is 6.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Valid Accounts (T1078); ranked at the 32th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to IA-12 (Identity Proofing) and IA-5 (Authenticator Management) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-2895 is a security vulnerability in funadmin versions up to 7.1.0-rc4, specifically affecting the repass function in the file app/frontend/controller/Member.php. The flaw enables weak password recovery through manipulation of the forget_code or vercode arguments, classified under CWE-640. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 3.7 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N), indicating low severity with network accessibility but high attack complexity.
Remote attackers require no privileges to attempt exploitation, though the high complexity makes it difficult to execute successfully. Exploitation leads to a low-impact integrity violation, allowing weak password recovery that could compromise user account security by bypassing robust recovery controls.
Advisories note that the vendor was contacted early about the disclosure but provided no response, with no patches or official mitigations available. References include GitHub issues at https://github.com/I4m6da/CVE/issues/2 and related comments, as well as VulDB entries at https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.347206, https://vuldb.com/?id.347206, and https://vuldb.com/?submit.753971, which confirm the issue details.
The exploit has been publicly released and may be used for attacks, though exploitation remains known to be difficult. The vulnerability was published on 2026-02-21.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-7532
Vulnerability Data
A security flaw has been discovered in funadmin up to 7.1.0-rc4. Affected by this issue is the function repass of the file app/frontend/controller/Member.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument forget_code/vercode results in weak password recovery. Remote exploitation of the attack…
more
is possible. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V7.4.3
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Identity proofing at appropriate assurance levels ensures forgotten-password recovery cannot succeed without strong verification of the user.
Authenticator management requires secure distribution, reset, and verification procedures that directly address weak password recovery flows.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Credential lifecycle management directly includes password reset/recovery flows.
Identity proofing is the core control that prevents weak or bypassed recovery mechanisms.
Authentication policy covers strength/MFA but does not address recovery path weaknesses.
Secure SDLC reduces implementation flaws but is not specific to password-recovery design.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Strong authentication-information lifecycle rules directly address weak password-recovery flows.
Secure-SDLC practices can embed strong recovery design, yet the control is broader than this single weakness.
Application-security requirements can mandate secure recovery flows, but the control covers many other requirements.
Secure-coding standards can prevent weak recovery implementations, yet the control is wider in scope.
Secure-authentication requirements include robust forgotten-password procedures.