Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-29185

Path Traversal in Linuxfoundation Backstage\/Integration ≤ 1.20.1

Published
07 March 2026
Modified
25 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 2.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0035 27th percentile
Risk Priority 15 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-29185 is a low-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Linuxfoundation Backstage\/Integration. Its CVSS base score is 2.7 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 27th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Prior to version 1.20.1, a vulnerability in the SCM URL parsing used by Backstage integrations allowed path traversal sequences in encoded form to be included in file paths. When these URLs…

more

were processed by integration functions that construct API URLs, the traversal segments could redirect requests to unintended SCM provider API endpoints using the configured server-side integration credentials. This issue has been patched in version 1.20.1.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Why these techniques?

Path traversal in Backstage SCM integrations directly enables exploitation of the application (public or internal portal) to abuse server-side credentials against unintended endpoints.

Confidence: HIGH · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-25152Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-27969Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2024-26150Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-41491Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-35167Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-33211Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-40923Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2025-59352Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2026-37531Same vendor: Linuxfoundation
CVE-2025-7712Shared CWE-22

Affected Assets

linuxfoundation
backstage\/integration
≤ 1.20.1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly requires validation of URL inputs to reject path traversal sequences before they are used to construct SCM API requests.

prevent

Enforces access policy so that integration credentials cannot be used against unintended SCM endpoints even if a crafted URL reaches the request logic.

prevent

Enforces information-flow rules that limit which SCM provider endpoints may be reached by server-side integration components.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.

mitigates

Information access restriction limits which files an application may read or write.

References