Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2026-3167 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Tenda F453 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 47th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-3167 is a buffer overflow vulnerability affecting the Tenda F453 router running firmware version 1.0.0.3. The flaw resides in the formWebTypeLibrary function within the /goform/webtypelibrary endpoint of the httpd component. It is triggered by manipulating the webSiteId argument, leading to improper bounds checking as associated with CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) and CWE-120 (Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input). The vulnerability was published on 2026-02-25 and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high severity.
A remote attacker with low privileges, such as an authenticated user, can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required. Successful exploitation results in high impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution, data compromise, or denial of service on the affected device.
Advisories and additional details are available through references including a GitHub repository at https://github.com/Litengzheng/vul_db/blob/main/F453/vul_66/README.md, multiple VulDB entries at https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.347674, https://vuldb.com/?id.347674, and https://vuldb.com/?submit.759594, and the vendor site at https://www.tenda.com.cn/. These sources may provide guidance on patches or mitigations, though specific remediation steps are not detailed here.
The exploit for CVE-2026-3167 has been publicly released, increasing the risk of active attacks against unpatched Tenda F453 devices.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-8625
Vulnerability Data
A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda F453 1.0.0.3. The impacted element is the function formWebTypeLibrary of the file /goform/webtypelibrary of the component httpd. Performing a manipulation of the argument webSiteId results in buffer overflow. The attack may be…
more
initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.