CVE-2026-32925
Memory Safety in Fujielectric V-Sft ≤ 6.2.10.0
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2026-32925 is a high-severity Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121) vulnerability in Fujielectric V-Sft. Its CVSS base score is 8.4 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 11th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-32925 is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-121) affecting V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior. The flaw resides in the VS6ComFile!CV7BaseMap::WriteV7DataToRom component, where processing a specially crafted V7 file can trigger the overflow, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution on the affected product.
The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Exploitation requires local access to the system with low attack complexity and no privileges, but relies on user interaction, such as convincing a user to open a malicious V7 file. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to achieve high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, including full arbitrary code execution in the context of the application.
Mitigation details and patch information are available in the vendor advisory from Fuji Electric at https://felib.fujielectric.co.jp/en/M10010/M20060/document_detail/5d9dd71d-9494-41a4-aa5c-8e6b8b21066b?region=en-glb and the JVN advisory at https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU90448293/. Security practitioners should review these resources for update instructions and workarounds.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-18098
Vulnerability Data
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain a stack-based buffer overflow in VS6ComFile!CV7BaseMap::WriteV7DataToRom. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to arbitrary code execution on the affected product.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
—
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can discover stack-buffer overflows before deployment.
Input validation directly stops untrusted data from exceeding stack buffer bounds.
Memory-protection mechanisms limit the ability to execute injected code after a stack overflow.
Secure-engineering principles include bounds-checked coding and safe buffer handling that avoid introducing the flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices directly prevent introduction of stack buffer overflows.
Vulnerability scanning can discover stack buffer overflows but does not prevent their introduction.
Patching eliminates known instances of the weakness after discovery.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing (fuzzing, static analysis) detects stack overflows before release.
Secure SDLC mandates buffer-safety practices that directly prevent stack overflows.
Application security requirements can specify buffer-size and input-validation rules.
Secure architecture principles include memory-safety and least-privilege stack usage.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe buffer handling that causes CWE-121.
Change-management gates can enforce security reviews that catch buffer issues.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
- V-248594 OL 8 must implement address space layout randomization (ASLR) to protect its memory from unauthorized code execution. prevents CWE-121
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
- V-271452 OL 9 must use a Linux Security Module configured to enforce limits on system services. prevents CWE-121