Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-33707

Auth Bypass in Chamilo Lms ≤ 1.11.38

Published
10 April 2026
Modified
16 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0043 35th percentile
Risk Priority 68 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-33707 is a critical-severity Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password (CWE-640) vulnerability in Chamilo Chamilo Lms. Its CVSS base score is 9.4 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Valid Accounts (T1078); ranked at the 35th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to IA-12 (Identity Proofing) and IA-5 (Authenticator Management) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-33707 affects Chamilo LMS, an open-source learning management system, in versions prior to 1.11.38 and 2.0.0-RC.3. The vulnerability lies in the default password reset mechanism, which generates reset tokens using a deterministic SHA1 hash of the user's email address (sha1($email)) without any random component, expiration time, or rate limiting. This makes the tokens fully predictable for anyone who knows the target email, enabling unauthorized password changes. The issue is classified under CWE-640 (Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password) with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.4 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L), indicating critical severity due to high impacts on confidentiality and integrity.

Any unauthenticated attacker with knowledge of a victim's email address—which is often publicly exposed or guessable—can exploit this over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required. By computing the exact reset token, the attacker can initiate a password reset request and immediately use the token to set a new password for the victim account, gaining full unauthorized access to the user's profile, courses, and potentially administrative functions depending on the victim's privileges.

The vulnerability is addressed in Chamilo LMS versions 1.11.38 and 2.0.0-RC.3 through commits that improve token generation with randomness, expiration, and rate limiting, as detailed in the GitHub security advisory (GHSA-f27g-66gq-g7v2) and specific patches (commits 078d7e5b77679fa7ccfcd6783bd5cc683db0bda8 and 750a45312a0d5c3ad60dbfbd0d959ca40be4a18c). Security practitioners should upgrade affected instances immediately and review email exposure in their deployments.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Chamilo LMS is a learning management system. Prior to 1.11.38 and 2.0.0-RC.3, the default password reset mechanism generates tokens using sha1($email) with no random component, no expiration, and no rate limiting. An attacker who knows a user's email can compute…

more

the reset token and change the victim's password without authentication. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.11.38 and 2.0.0-RC.3.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1078 Valid Accounts Stealth
Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion.
T1110 Brute Force Credential Access
Adversaries may use brute force techniques to gain access to accounts when passwords are unknown or when password hashes are obtained.
T1110.001 Password Guessing Credential Access
Adversaries with no prior knowledge of legitimate credentials within the system or environment may guess passwords to attempt access to accounts.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-30876Same product: Chamilo Chamilo Lms
CVE-2026-33710Same product: Chamilo Chamilo Lms
CVE-2026-33706Same product: Chamilo Chamilo Lms
CVE-2026-40291Same product: Chamilo Chamilo Lms
CVE-2026-1106Same product: Chamilo Chamilo Lms
CVE-2026-32930Same product: Chamilo Chamilo Lms
CVE-2026-32893Same product: Chamilo Chamilo Lms
CVE-2023-34944Same product: Chamilo Chamilo Lms
CVE-2025-69581Same product: Chamilo Chamilo Lms
CVE-2023-4225Same product: Chamilo Chamilo Lms

Affected Assets

chamilo
chamilo lms
2.0.0 · ≤ 1.11.38

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V7.4.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Identity proofing at appropriate assurance levels ensures forgotten-password recovery cannot succeed without strong verification of the user.

Authenticator management requires secure distribution, reset, and verification procedures that directly address weak password recovery flows.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-01 mostly match
prevents

Credential lifecycle management directly includes password reset/recovery flows.

PR.AA-02 mostly match
prevents

Identity proofing is the core control that prevents weak or bypassed recovery mechanisms.

PR.AA-03 partial match
prevents

Authentication policy covers strength/MFA but does not address recovery path weaknesses.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC reduces implementation flaws but is not specific to password-recovery design.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Strong authentication-information lifecycle rules directly address weak password-recovery flows.

prevents

Secure-SDLC practices can embed strong recovery design, yet the control is broader than this single weakness.

prevents

Application-security requirements can mandate secure recovery flows, but the control covers many other requirements.

prevents

Secure-coding standards can prevent weak recovery implementations, yet the control is wider in scope.

mitigates

Secure-authentication requirements include robust forgotten-password procedures.

none

Proper access-rights provisioning can limit who can trigger recovery, but does not fix the recovery mechanism itself.

References