Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-34954

SSRF in Praisonaiagents ≤ 1.5.95

Public PoCSSRF
Published
03 April 2026
Modified
24 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0040 34th percentile
Risk Priority 61 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-34954 is a high-severity SSRF (CWE-918) vulnerability in Praison Praisonaiagents. Its CVSS base score is 8.6 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 34th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-34954 is a server-side request forgery vulnerability (CWE-918) affecting PraisonAI, a multi-agent teams system, in versions prior to 1.5.95. The issue resides in the FileTools.download_file() function within the praisonaiagents component, which validates the destination path but performs no validation on the URL parameter. This URL is passed directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True, enabling unintended network requests.

An unauthenticated remote attacker (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) who can control the URL parameter—such as through user-supplied input to the function—can exploit this vulnerability to force the server to connect to arbitrary hosts reachable from its network context. This includes cloud metadata services and internal network services, potentially allowing high confidentiality impact through data exfiltration (CVSS:3.1 score of 8.6 with scope changed and no integrity or availability impact).

The vulnerability has been addressed in PraisonAI version 1.5.95. Additional details on the patch and remediation are available in the GitHub security advisory at https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-44c2-3rw4-5gvh.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach…

more

any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-44335Same product: Praison Praisonaiagents
CVE-2026-40150Same product: Praison Praisonaiagents
CVE-2026-40160Same product: Praison Praisonaiagents
CVE-2026-40152Same product: Praison Praisonaiagents
CVE-2026-34937Same product: Praison Praisonaiagents
CVE-2026-40114Same vendor: Praison
CVE-2026-34938Same product: Praison Praisonaiagents
CVE-2026-40153Same product: Praison Praisonaiagents
CVE-2026-41496Same product: Praison Praisonaiagents
CVE-2026-34936Same vendor: Praison

Affected Assets

praison
praisonaiagents
≤ 1.5.95

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.6
  • V1.5.3
  • V5.3.2
  • V10.4.7

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Information flow enforcement can restrict which destinations the server is allowed to contact on behalf of users.

Input validation directly stops untrusted URLs from being accepted and fetched without destination checks.

Boundary protection limits the network reach of server-initiated requests even if SSRF occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly include input validation and destination allow-listing that prevent SSRF.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Operational threat data describing SSRF campaigns can be used to tighten outbound-request allow-lists and detection rules before attackers exploit them.

References