Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-4528

SSRF

Published
21 March 2026
Modified
24 April 2026
CVSS Score v4 6.9
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0030 22th percentile
Risk Priority 40 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-4528 is a medium-severity SSRF (CWE-918) vulnerability in Notion (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 6.9 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 22th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-4528 is a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, classified under CWE-918, affecting trueleaf ApiFlow version 0.9.7. The flaw exists in the validateUrlSecurity function located in the file packages/server/src/service/proxy/http_proxy.service.ts within the URL Validation Handler component. Published on 2026-03-21, it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L), indicating high severity due to its network accessibility and low complexity.

Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability without privileges or user interaction, enabling server-side request forgery. By manipulating the URL validation, attackers can trick the server into making unauthorized requests, potentially leading to limited impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability as per the CVSS vector.

Advisories available at VulDB (ctiid.352316, id.352316, submit.784197) and a Notion page detail the SSRF issue in ApiFlow, noting that the exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized by attackers. Security practitioners should review these references for additional technical details and recommended mitigations.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was determined in trueleaf ApiFlow 0.9.7. The impacted element is the function validateUrlSecurity of the file packages/server/src/service/proxy/http_proxy.service.ts of the component URL Validation Handler. This manipulation causes server-side request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit…

more

has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-13096Shared CWE-918
CVE-2026-67311Shared CWE-918
CVE-2023-29260Shared CWE-918
CVE-2024-37208Shared CWE-918
CVE-2024-6538Shared CWE-918
CVE-2025-46568Shared CWE-918
CVE-2026-26137Shared CWE-918
CVE-2024-29319Shared CWE-918
CVE-2023-6852Shared CWE-918
CVE-2024-0303Shared CWE-918

Affected Assets

Notion
—
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.6
  • V1.5.3
  • V5.3.2
  • V10.4.7

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Information flow enforcement can restrict which destinations the server is allowed to contact on behalf of users.

Input validation directly stops untrusted URLs from being accepted and fetched without destination checks.

Boundary protection limits the network reach of server-initiated requests even if SSRF occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly include input validation and destination allow-listing that prevent SSRF.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Operational threat data describing SSRF campaigns can be used to tighten outbound-request allow-lists and detection rules before attackers exploit them.

References