Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-50252

Nlnetlabs Unbound 1.4.22 – 1.25.2

Published
22 July 2026
Modified
24 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 5.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Amber
EPSS Score 0.0014 4th percentile
Risk Priority 31 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-50252 is a medium-severity Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data (CWE-349) vulnerability in Nlnetlabs Unbound. Its CVSS base score is 5.7 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Subvert Trust Controls (T1553); ranked at the 4th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.4.22 up to and including 1.25.1, UDP source port is randomized and intended to serve as a secret value that increases the entropy of DNS transactions. When resolver load balancing policies depend on the source port…

more

while their outcome is revealed this secrecy is undermined. The vulnerability arises when the load balancing policy is consistent with respect to the incoming source UDP port and IP address while heavily depending on the incoming source UDP port as a randomization source. When the SO_REUSEPORT configuration option is enabled ('so-reuseport: yes') in Unbound (by default), it meets these conditions, making it vulnerable for DNS cache poisoning attacks. Upon startup, Unbound randomly partitions the available UDP source port space into disjoint subsets of (almost) equal size, assigning each subset to a specific worker thread. When an incoming DNS query is received, the kernel’s SO_REUSEPORT load balancing mechanism deterministically assigns the query to a socket associated with a particular thread. All outgoing DNS queries generated during the resolution of that request use source ports selected exclusively from the port subset assigned to the corresponding thread. Since these port subsets are disjoint across threads, the source port observed in a resolver’s outgoing query to an authoritative name server serves as a reliable indicator of the worker thread that processed the original client query. A malicious actor can acquire the mapping between incoming UDP source ports (for a given fixed source IP address) and Unbound worker threads and leverage it to conduct DNS cache poisoning attacks by effectively lowering the random port population per thread.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1553 Subvert Trust Controls Defense Impairment
Adversaries may undermine security controls that will either warn users of untrusted activity or prevent execution of untrusted programs.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-42960Same product: Nlnetlabs Unbound
CVE-2026-50248Same product: Nlnetlabs Unbound
CVE-2026-44690Same product: Nlnetlabs Unbound
CVE-2026-33278Same product: Nlnetlabs Unbound
CVE-2026-41292Same product: Nlnetlabs Unbound
CVE-2026-52863Same product: Nlnetlabs Unbound
CVE-2026-50045Same product: Nlnetlabs Unbound
CVE-2026-41637Same product: Nlnetlabs Unbound
CVE-2026-40622Same product: Nlnetlabs Unbound
CVE-2026-42944Same product: Nlnetlabs Unbound

Affected Assets

nlnetlabs
unbound
1.4.22 — 1.25.2

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 5 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.2
  • V10.4.7
  • V3.7.3
  • V5.3.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Information flow enforcement can block untrusted data from being accepted or processed as if it were trusted.

Input validation directly stops acceptance of untrusted data mixed into trusted inputs.

Associating security attributes with data allows the system to distinguish and reject extraneous untrusted portions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly address proper trust-boundary enforcement and input validation, preventing this class of weakness during development.

PR.DS-01 partial match
prevents

Cryptographic integrity checks on data-at-rest can detect tampering or substitution of untrusted content mixed with trusted data.

PR.DS-02 partial match
prevents

Cryptographic integrity mechanisms on data-in-transit can prevent acceptance of extraneous untrusted data by validating origin and detecting modification.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect the weakness but does not itself implement preventive controls.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and trust-boundary enforcement that directly prevents acceptance of untrusted data alongside trusted data.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for strict separation and validation of trusted versus untrusted data sources.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require explicit trust boundaries and data-origin checks that mitigate mixing of trusted and untrusted inputs.

prevents

Secure coding standards mandate input sanitization and provenance checks that prevent acceptance of extraneous untrusted data.

none

Information access restriction limits who can supply data but does not address validation of data origin or trust level.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
  • V-248574 YUM must be configured to prevent the installation of patches, service packs, device drivers, or OL 8 system components that have not been digitally signed using a certificate that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-349

References