Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-57025

Juniper Junos Os Evolved ≤ 23.2

Published
09 July 2026
Modified
16 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 6.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:A/V:X/RE:M/U:X
EPSS Score 0.00098 0.9th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-57025 is a medium-severity Return of Pointer Value Outside of Expected Range (CWE-466) vulnerability in Juniper Junos Os Evolved. Its CVSS base score is 6.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004); ranked at the 0.9th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-6 (Least Privilege) and SI-2 (Flaw Remediation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

No EU or UK CSIRT advisories indexed for this CVE.

Vulnerability Data

A Return of Pointer Value Outside of Expected Range vulnerability in the fileio library of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, low-privilged attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). On EX Series, QFX Series and MX…

more

Series a low-privileged attacker issuing a specific 'show l2-learning' or 'show ethernet-switching' command will cause an l2ald crash which will lead to a temporary service impact for all layer 2 services until the process has automatically restarted. This issue affects EX Series, QFX Series, MX Series: Junos OS: * all versions before 23.2R2-S7, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S7, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S2. Junos OS Evolved: * all versions before 23.2R2-S7-EVO, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S8-EVO, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-EVO, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S3-EVO.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1499.004 Application or System Exploitation Impact
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities that can cause an application or system to crash and deny availability to users.
Why these techniques?

The vulnerability allows a low-privileged local attacker to trigger a crash in the l2ald process via a crafted 'show l2-learning' command, resulting in temporary DoS for Layer 2 services. This directly maps to T1499.004 (Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation) as the command input is abused to exhaust or crash a critical system process.

Confidence: MEDIUM · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-33781Same product: Juniper Ex4000
CVE-2026-21910Same product: Juniper Ex4000
CVE-2025-60007Same product: Juniper Ex2300
CVE-2026-57029Same product: Juniper Junos Os Evolved
CVE-2026-57019Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2026-33775Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2026-33782Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2026-57032Same product: Juniper Ex2300
CVE-2024-21587Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2026-57027Same product: Juniper Ex4100

Affected Assets

juniper
junos
23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4 · ≤ 23.2
juniper
junos os evolved
23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4 · ≤ 23.2

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
  • SI-2 Flaw Remediation
  • CM-6 Configuration Settings
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.4.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Least privilege directly limits the attack surface by ensuring only authorized users can execute the 'show l2-learning' command that triggers the l2ald crash.

prevent

Flaw remediation requires timely patching of the fileio library vulnerability in Junos OS/EVO to eliminate the out-of-range pointer return that causes the DoS.

prevent

Configuration settings can restrict or disable the vulnerable 'show l2-learning' command for non-administrative roles until patches are applied.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices enforce bounds checking, static analysis, and pointer validation that directly prevent out-of-range pointer returns.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development can detect out-of-range pointer returns through static analysis and fuzzing.

prevents

Secure SDLC practices can include pointer-range validation and bounds checking to prevent out-of-range returns.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate pointer safety and range validation to avoid returning invalid addresses.

degrades

Secure architecture principles can enforce memory-safety patterns that reduce the likelihood of out-of-range pointer returns.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address pointer validation and bounds checking, mitigating this specific weakness.

References