Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-5892

Google Chrome ≤ 147.0.7727.55

Published
08 April 2026
Modified
24 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0017 7th percentile
Risk Priority 47 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-5892 is a medium-severity Policy Privileges are not Assigned Consistently Between Control and Data Agents (CWE-1268) vulnerability in Google Chrome. Its CVSS base score is 6.6 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 7th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SC-49 (Hardware-enforced Separation and Policy Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Insufficient policy enforcement in PWAs in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to install a PWA without user consent via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1548 Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may circumvent mechanisms designed to control privilege elevation to gain higher-level permissions.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-7960Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-13721Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-5902Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-8520Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-5890Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-7954Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-8880Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-10006Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-13882Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-2319Same product: Apple Macos

Affected Assets

google
chrome
≤ 147.0.7727.55

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SC-49 explicitly requires hardware-enforced separation and policy enforcement mechanisms, directly addressing the hardware access-control inconsistency described by the weakness.

AC-3 requires consistent enforcement of authorizations for all access requests, directly stopping inconsistent control vs. data policy privileges from being exploitable.

AC-24 mandates that access control decisions apply the correct policy to every request, preventing privilege discrepancies between agents from being introduced or used.

SC-3 isolates security functions and their policies from other functionality, structurally avoiding inconsistent privilege assignments between control and data paths.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 partial match
prevents

PR.AA-05 policy/least-privilege practices can surface inconsistent privilege definitions (partial prevention) but do not address hardware-specific control-vs-data agent discrepancies at all (none).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Directly governs the assignment and review of access rights, addressing inconsistent privilege mappings between agents.

degrades

Specifies management of privileged access rights, mitigating discrepancies between control-plane and data-plane privileges.

prevents

Defines the overarching access-control policy that should enforce consistent privileges between control and data agents.

prevents

Implements technical restrictions on information access that can prevent inconsistent privilege enforcement.

none

Restricts privileged utility programs, indirectly reducing risk of inconsistent privilege use but not addressing policy mapping.

References