Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-64775

Apple Macos 14.0 – 14.8.8

Published
27 July 2026
Modified
29 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0037 30th percentile
Risk Priority 71 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-64775 is a critical-severity Improper Initialization (CWE-665) vulnerability in Apple Macos. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, ranked at the 30th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A memory initialization issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.6 and iPadOS 26.6, macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.6, tvOS 26.6, visionOS 26.6, watchOS 26.6. An app may be able…

more

to cause unexpected system termination.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2020-27950Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2026-43654Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2025-31233Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2026-28847Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2024-27826Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2024-54538Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2026-20617Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2025-31209Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2024-27884Same product: Apple Ipados
CVE-2025-31208Same product: Apple Ipados

Affected Assets

apple
ipados
≤ 26.6
apple
iphone os
≤ 26.6
apple
macos
14.0 — 14.8.8 · 15.0 — 15.7.8 · 26.0 — 26.6
apple
tvos
≤ 26.6
apple
visionos
≤ 26.6
apple
watchos
≤ 26.6

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation directly exercises initialization paths and can reveal missing or incorrect resource setup.

Engineering principles applied during design and implementation can require explicit initialization to a known state.

Requiring the system to fail to a known state structurally reduces the chance that uninitialized resources remain reachable.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly enforce proper resource initialization during coding and testing.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect uninitialized variables but does not itself enforce initialization practices.

prevents

Configuration management can enforce secure defaults and initialization settings but is not the primary control for code-level initialization.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates initialization checks and secure defaults that directly prevent improper resource initialization.

prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles require explicit initialization of resources and secure state management.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid uninitialized variables and mandate proper resource initialization before use.

References