Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-7100

Memory Safety in Tenda F456 Firmware 1.0.0.5

Public PoCMemory Safety
Published
27 April 2026
Modified
30 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 7.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0062 48th percentile
Risk Priority 37 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-7100 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Tenda F456 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Process Injection (T1055); ranked at the 48th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-7100 is a buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-119, CWE-120) affecting the Tenda F456 router on firmware version 1.0.0.5. The flaw exists in the "fromNatlimitof" function within the "/goform/Natlimit" file of the httpd component. Published on 2026-04-27, it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

The vulnerability can be exploited remotely over the network by an attacker with low privileges, requiring low attack complexity and no user interaction. Successful exploitation triggers a buffer overflow, resulting in high impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution or system compromise.

References indicate that an exploit has been publicly disclosed, including a GitHub repository at https://github.com/Litengzheng/vuldb_new/blob/main/F456/vul_138/README.md. Additional details are available in VulDB advisories (https://vuldb.com/vuln/359675 and https://vuldb.com/submit/798473), with CTI at https://vuldb.com/vuln/359675/cti. Practitioners should check the Tenda vendor site (https://www.tenda.com.cn/) for any patches or mitigation guidance.

The published exploit may be actively used, heightening risk for unpatched Tenda F456 devices.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw has been found in Tenda F456 1.0.0.5. The impacted element is the function fromNatlimitof of the file /goform/Natlimit of the component httpd. Executing a manipulation can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit…

more

has been published and may be used.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1055 Process Injection Stealth
Adversaries may inject code into processes in order to evade process-based defenses as well as possibly elevate privileges.
T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-7097Same product: Tenda F456
CVE-2026-7080Same product: Tenda F456
CVE-2026-7057Same product: Tenda F456
CVE-2026-7031Same product: Tenda F456
CVE-2026-7053Same product: Tenda F456
CVE-2026-7099Same product: Tenda F456
CVE-2026-7019Same product: Tenda F456
CVE-2026-7032Same product: Tenda F456
CVE-2026-7081Same product: Tenda F456
CVE-2026-7030Same product: Tenda F456

Affected Assets

tenda
f456 firmware
1.0.0.5

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V17.3.2
  • V5.2.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.

Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.

Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.

Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.

ID.RA-08 partial match
prevents

Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.

PR.AT-02 partial match
prevents

Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.

prevents

Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe buffer operations, directly eliminating CWE-119.

finds

Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.

References