Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-7164

DoS in Freebsd 13.5 … 15.0

Published
30 April 2026
Modified
01 May 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0043 36th percentile
Risk Priority 57 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-7164 is a high-severity Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) vulnerability in Freebsd Freebsd. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 36th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SC-5 (Denial-of-service Protection) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-7164 is a vulnerability in FreeBSD's pf packet filter that stems from incorrect packet validation during the parsing of SCTP chunk parameters. This flaw enables unbounded recursion, which can lead to a stack overflow and subsequent kernel panic. The issue affects any FreeBSD system where pf is configured to process traffic, regardless of the specific ruleset in use.

Remote, unauthenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting malicious SCTP packets that trigger the recursive parsing error. Successful exploitation results in a denial-of-service condition, causing the affected system to panic and potentially reboot. The CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) reflects its network accessibility, low complexity, and high availability impact, with associated CWEs CWE-674 (Uncontrolled Recursion) and CWE-791 (Incomplete Filtering of Special Elements).

The FreeBSD security advisory at https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:14.pf.asc details mitigation steps and available patches for this vulnerability.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Incorrect packet validation allowed unbounded recursion parsing SCTP chunk parameters. This can eventually result in a stack overflow and panic. Remote attackers can craft packets which cause affected systems to panic. This affects any system where pf is configured to…

more

process traffic, independent of the configured ruleset.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-6759Same product: Freebsd Freebsd
CVE-2026-4247Same product: Freebsd Freebsd
CVE-2026-42511Same product: Freebsd Freebsd
CVE-2026-2261Same product: Freebsd Freebsd
CVE-2026-49414Same product: Freebsd Freebsd
CVE-2025-14769Same product: Freebsd Freebsd
CVE-2026-4652Same product: Freebsd Freebsd
CVE-2026-49416Same product: Freebsd Freebsd
CVE-2023-4809Same product: Freebsd Freebsd
CVE-2026-45251Same product: Freebsd Freebsd

Affected Assets

freebsd
freebsd
13.5, 14.3, 14.4, 15.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Input validation can reject or constrain data that would otherwise drive unbounded recursive calls.

DoS protection mechanisms limit the resource-exhaustion impact of uncontrolled recursion without eliminating the flaw.

System monitoring can observe anomalous resource consumption that signals runaway recursion after it begins.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent coding errors such as missing recursion limits or termination conditions.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of compute resources can detect excessive consumption caused by uncontrolled recursion.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record uncontrolled recursion flaws before deployment.

PR.IR-04 partial match
prevents

Capacity monitoring and resource provisioning can absorb or limit the impact of runaway recursion.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect excessive recursion via static analysis or fuzzing.

prevents

Secure development life cycle requires controls that prevent uncontrolled recursion through design and code review.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate recursion limits or stack-depth checks.

prevents

Secure system architecture principles include resource-management and input-validation rules that limit recursion.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prohibit or constrain recursive constructs that could exhaust stack or memory.

finds

Capacity management includes monitoring and limits that mitigate resource exhaustion from runaway recursion.

References