Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-7246

Command Injection in Palletsprojects Click ≤ 8.3.3

Published
30 April 2026
Modified
15 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0090 56th percentile
Risk Priority 52 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-7246 is a high-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Palletsprojects Click. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 44% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-7246 is a command injection vulnerability (CWE-77) affecting Pallets Click versions 8.3.2 and below, specifically in the click.edit() function. This flaw enables attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.2 (AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) and was published on 2026-04-30.

Exploitation requires local access (AV:L), high attack complexity (AC:H), elevated privileges (PR:H), and user interaction (UI:R). Despite the description noting execution from an unprivileged account, the CVSS metrics indicate high privileges are needed. Successful attacks can achieve high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts (C:I:A:H) with changed scope (S:C), potentially leading to full system compromise via arbitrary command execution.

Mitigation is addressed in the release of Click version 8.3.3, available at https://github.com/pallets/click/releases/tag/8.3.3. Additional details are provided in GitHub Security Advisories GHSA-47fr-3ffg-hgmw at https://github.com/tsigouris007/security-advisories/security/advisories/GHSA-47fr-3ffg-hgmw. Security practitioners should upgrade to the patched version and review the advisories for further guidance.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Pallets Click, versions 8.3.2 and below, contain a command injection vulnerability in the click.edit() function, allowing attackers to pass arbitrary OS commands from an unprivileged account.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.008 Network Device CLI Execution
Adversaries may abuse scripting or built-in command line interpreters (CLI) on network devices to execute malicious command and payloads.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-12814Shared CWE-77, CWE-78
CVE-2026-2188Shared CWE-77, CWE-78
CVE-2025-10774Shared CWE-77, CWE-78
CVE-2025-15254Shared CWE-77, CWE-78
CVE-2026-1544Shared CWE-77, CWE-78
CVE-2026-8112Shared CWE-77, CWE-78
CVE-2026-15547Shared CWE-77, CWE-78
CVE-2026-5995Shared CWE-77, CWE-78
CVE-2026-10872Shared CWE-77, CWE-78
CVE-2026-6028Shared CWE-77, CWE-78

Affected Assets

palletsprojects
click
≤ 8.3.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V1.2.9

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.

Least privilege reduces the permissions available to any process that could be subverted by injected commands.

Least functionality restricts available OS commands and interpreters, limiting the blast radius of injection.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.

none

Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.

References