Security Resilience

CVE-2026-72544

Published
11 August 2026
Modified
03 September 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0025 16th percentile
Risk Priority 56 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-72544 is a high-severity Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity (CWE-345) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 16th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-23 (Session Authenticity) and SI-7 (Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An integrity verification vulnerability in OpenSignLabs OpenSign through 2.37.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to forge document audit-trail entries via the triggerevent Parse cloud function. The function accepts viewer identity and IP address as caller-supplied parameters without authentication, allowing fabrication of…

more

arbitrary audit log entries. An attacker can tamper with the legal audit trail of any signed document, undermining non-repudiation.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-37920Shared CWE-345
CVE-2024-7847Shared CWE-345
CVE-2026-32029Shared CWE-345
CVE-2026-49212Shared CWE-345
CVE-2023-35764Shared CWE-345
CVE-2024-40644Shared CWE-345
CVE-2025-24807Shared CWE-345
CVE-2023-0350Shared CWE-345
CVE-2025-8978Shared CWE-345
CVE-2026-6498Shared CWE-345

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Explicit requirement to protect session authenticity structurally prevents the weakness for communications.

Integrity verification tools detect (but do not stop) the acceptance of data lacking authenticity.

Cryptographic mechanisms can be used to verify authenticity, thereby preventing acceptance of invalid data.

Associating security attributes with exchanged information supports verification of authenticity.

Integrity protection on transmitted data directly stops acceptance of unauthenticated or altered data.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect missing or weak data authenticity verification.

blocks

A.8.24's guidance on identifying protection levels, selecting algorithms/strength for authenticity/integrity (items b,f), using cryptography for transmitted/stored data (c), and key management directly stops many CWE-345 exploits by ensuring verifiable authenticity; however, it leaves a bounded remainder where verification logic itself is flawed or absent (e.g. accepting unverified signatures or weak schemes), as the control depends on correct implementation in other mechanisms.

prevents

Secure coding practices include implementing proper data authenticity checks.

blocks

Secure authentication of data sources ensures only valid, authentic data is accepted.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

References