Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2026-7398 is a medium-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 5.5 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 34th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-7398 is a path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) identified in the florensiawidjaja BioinfoMCP project up to commit 7ada7918b9e515604d3c0ae264d3a9af10bf6e54. The flaw affects the Upload function in the file bioinfo_mcp_platform/app.py, specifically within the Upload Endpoint, where manipulation of the 'Name' argument enables attackers to traverse directories.
The vulnerability can be exploited remotely by unauthenticated attackers over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required, as indicated by its CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L). Successful exploitation grants limited impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, such as reading or modifying files outside the intended directory. A public exploit is available, increasing the risk of real-world attacks.
Advisories note that BioinfoMCP employs continuous delivery with rolling releases, providing no specific details on affected or updated versions. The project was informed early through GitHub issue #2 but has not responded. Relevant references include the project's GitHub repository (https://github.com/florensiawidjaja/BioinfoMCP/), the issue tracker (https://github.com/florensiawidjaja/BioinfoMCP/issues/2), and VulDB entries (https://vuldb.com/submit/803488, https://vuldb.com/vuln/360122, https://vuldb.com/vuln/360122/cti).
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-26274
Vulnerability Data
A weakness has been identified in florensiawidjaja BioinfoMCP up to 7ada7918b9e515604d3c0ae264d3a9af10bf6e54. This vulnerability affects the function Upload of the file bioinfo_mcp_platform/app.py of the component Upload Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument Name causes path traversal. The attack can be initiated…
more
remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.3.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.
Input validation directly neutralizes special path elements before pathname construction occurs.
Least privilege reduces the impact of any unauthorized file access obtained via traversal.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.
PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.
Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.
Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.
Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.
Information access restriction limits which files an application may read or write.