Security Resilience

CVE-2026-75748

SSRF in Adobe Coldfusion 2023 … 2025

Published
13 October 2026
Modified
20 October 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0059 47th percentile
Risk Priority 50 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-75748 is a high-severity SSRF (CWE-918) vulnerability in Adobe Coldfusion. Its CVSS base score is 7.6 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 47th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SC-7 (Boundary Protection) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

ColdFusion is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user…

more

interaction. Scope is changed.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-47121Shared CWE-918
CVE-2024-1568Shared CWE-918
CVE-2026-31955Shared CWE-918
CVE-2026-22219Shared CWE-918
CVE-2026-39965Shared CWE-918
CVE-2026-86173Shared CWE-918
CVE-2025-29461Shared CWE-918
CVE-2024-9710Shared CWE-918
CVE-2024-11449Shared CWE-918
CVE-2026-15409Shared CWE-918

Affected Assets

adobe
coldfusion
2023, 2025

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.6
  • V1.5.3
  • V5.3.2
  • V10.4.7

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Information flow enforcement can restrict which destinations the server is allowed to contact on behalf of users.

Boundary protection limits the network reach of server-initiated requests even if SSRF occurs.

Input validation directly stops untrusted URLs from being accepted and fetched without destination checks.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
blocks

Secure development practices directly include input validation and destination allow-listing that prevent SSRF.

DE.CM-09 partial match
blocks

Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.

ID.RA-01 partial match
blocks

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.

PR.IR-01 partial match
blocks

Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.

References