Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-7639

Imaginationtech Ddk ≤ 26.1

Published
10 July 2026
Modified
12 August 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0012 2th percentile
Risk Priority 54 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-7639 is a high-severity Incomplete Cleanup (CWE-459) vulnerability in Imaginationtech Ddk. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data from Local System (T1005); ranked at the 2th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-14 (Non-persistence) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Software installed and run as a non-privileged user may conduct a sequence of improper GPU system calls causing use after free, which helps in facilitating unprivileged memory access from a shader code. Triggering failure path in the MMU mapping logic…

more

by a malicious code could lead to incomplete cleanup of an internal driver state, allowing for future unauthorized access to the contents of the physical memory.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1005 Data from Local System Collection
Adversaries may search local system sources, such as file systems, configuration files, local databases, virtual machine files, or process memory, to find files of interest and sensitive data prior to Exfiltration.
T1552 Unsecured Credentials Credential Access
Adversaries may search compromised systems to find and obtain insecurely stored credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-46707Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-49745Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-45196Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-34196Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-49744Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-34193Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-21733Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-49743Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-16280Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-41154Same product: Google Android

Affected Assets

imaginationtech
ddk
26.1 · ≤ 26.1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V6.4.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover incomplete cleanup through dynamic analysis or resource-leak testing.

Non-persistence mechanisms explicitly initiate resources in a known state and terminate them, directly enforcing cleanup.

Session termination forces explicit release of session-related temporary resources.

Preventing unintended information transfer through shared resources requires complete cleanup of those resources.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure-development practices and coding standards normally require proper resource release and cleanup.

ID.AM-08 partial match
prevents

Life-cycle management encompasses disposal of temporary resources but does not specifically target runtime cleanup bugs.

PR.DS-10 partial match
prevents

Explicitly calls for removing sensitive data after use, directly addressing one class of incomplete cleanup.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Explicitly requires secure deletion of temporary or residual data, directly addressing incomplete cleanup.

prevents

SDLC practices include cleanup steps, yet the weakness can still occur if those steps are omitted.

prevents

Secure-coding rules can mandate explicit cleanup of temporary resources, but do not guarantee it.

finds

Change-management processes may require cleanup verification, but the control itself does not address the weakness.

References